2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detrital zircon geochronology and processes in accretionary wedges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common approach is the comparison of age distribution patterns and maximum ages of deposition inferred for the youngest grains in a distinct sample. This methodology, when applied for each of the subunits forming paleo-duplexes, is known to enable an efficient tracking of the source of accreted material as well as identification of age gaps and potential episodes of tectonic erosion (e.g., Cawood et al, 2012;Žák et al, 2020). Complex also pointed to transient periods of duplexing during the entire Franciscan subduction history that lasted >100 m.y.…”
Section: Evidence For Mass Transfer and Crustal Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common approach is the comparison of age distribution patterns and maximum ages of deposition inferred for the youngest grains in a distinct sample. This methodology, when applied for each of the subunits forming paleo-duplexes, is known to enable an efficient tracking of the source of accreted material as well as identification of age gaps and potential episodes of tectonic erosion (e.g., Cawood et al, 2012;Žák et al, 2020). Complex also pointed to transient periods of duplexing during the entire Franciscan subduction history that lasted >100 m.y.…”
Section: Evidence For Mass Transfer and Crustal Recyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The youngest detrital zircons are commonly used to evaluate the maximum depositional ages of the host sediments and may approximate the timing of sediment deposition if syn‐sedimentary igneous activity is continuous in the source region, as exemplified for sediments in the arc‐flanking basins of convergent plate margins (Cawood et al., 2012; Dickinson & Gehrels, 2009; Žák et al., 2020). This is applicable to the mélange matrix samples, because magmatic activity in their source region, that is, the Yili‐Central Tianshan Block, was relatively continuous during the Paleozoic (Figure 10a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accretionary orogens that formed at sites of ongoing oceanic subduction along convergent margins and ultimately evolved into a collisional phase subsequent to oceanic closure are often accompanied by considerable continental growth (e.g., Aitchison & Buckman, 2012; Cawood et al., 2009). Accretionary complexes (or accretionary prisms/wedges and subduction‐accretion complexes) are key elements of accretionary and collisional orogens and, if present, are commonly regarded as excellent archive of subduction‐accretion and collision events in ancient orogens (Cawood et al., 2009; Kusky et al., 2020; Žák et al., 2020). The Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB; Figure 1a) in northeast Eurasia is a typical accretionary orogen formed by multiple accretion of microcontinents, island arcs, oceanic plateaus, and accretionary complexes in the Paleo‐Asian Ocean (e.g., Buckman & Aitchison, 2004; Coleman, 1989; Gao et al., 2018; Kröner et al., 2007; Schulmann & Paterson, 2011; Sengör et al., 1993, 2018; Wan et al., 2017, 2018; Windley et al., 2007; Xiao et al., 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a, b). This complex formed during the Cadomian orogeny, as part of a long-lived subduction/accretionary system along the northern Gondwana periphery and now underlies much of the Teplá-Barrandian Unit (e.g., Hajná et al 2013Hajná et al , 2018Žák et al 2020). The accretionary complex is composed of basalt-bearing mélanges with a block-in-matrix fabric (Belts 1-3), a chert-graywacke mélange (Belt I), and coherent, bedded units without cherts and basalts (Belts II-III; Fig.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The Bohemian Massif is otherwise well-known for abundant quartz-sulfide or carbonate-quartz Au deposits (Morávek and Pouba 1987;Zachariáš et al 2013Zachariáš et al , 2014Němec and Zachariáš 2017) hosted by late Neoproterozoic-early Cambrian volcanosedimentary complexes of the Teplá-Barrandian Unit (~ 630-520 Ma; Sláma et al 2008;Drost et al 2011;Hajná et al 2018;Žák et al 2020) and arious units metamorphosed during the Variscan orogeny (ca. 400-300 Ma;Franke 2006;Kroner and Romer 2013;Edel et al 2018;Schulmann et al 2022 and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%