2014
DOI: 10.5121/ijnlc.2014.3202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developemnt and Evaluation of A Web Based Question Answering System for Arabic Languag

Abstract: Question Answering (QA) systems are gaining great importance due to the increasing amount of web content and the high demand for digital information that regular information retrieval techniques cannot satisfy. A question answering system enables users to have a natural language dialog with the machine, which is required for virtually all emerging online service systems on the Internet. The need for such systems is higher in the context of the Arabic language. This is because of the scarcity of Arabic QA syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments were conducted on the NER module, question classification module, and overall system performance on 59 questions evaluated manually by five Quranic experts. Kurdi et al[45] proposed an Arabic QA system, named JAWEB, which aims to answer factoid questions ("who," "what," "where," and "when"). JAWEB consists of the three components of QA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Experiments were conducted on the NER module, question classification module, and overall system performance on 59 questions evaluated manually by five Quranic experts. Kurdi et al[45] proposed an Arabic QA system, named JAWEB, which aims to answer factoid questions ("who," "what," "where," and "when"). JAWEB consists of the three components of QA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest recall measure among all the systems was 100%, which was achieved by two QA systems. The first was the open-domain factoid QA system JAWEB[45], which did not specify the number of QA pairs experimented on but implemented QE and question classification. The second was a hybrid QA system[33] that experimented with 43 open-domain QA pairs without QE and question classification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation