2019
DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0058-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a brain atlas through deep learning

Abstract: Neuroscientists have devoted significant effort into the creation of standard brain reference atlases for high-throughput registration of anatomical regions of interest. However, variability in brain size and form across individuals poses a significant challenge for such reference atlases. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a fully automated deep neural networkbased method (SeBRe) for registration through Segmenting Brain Regions of interest with minimal human supervision. We demonstrate the validity … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is beyond any doubt that DL is contributing to improving the knowledge in several areas, some of them very difficult to interpret because of the nature of obtained data, like neuroscience [39]. These advances are expanding the frontiers of verifiable knowledge beyond classic human standards.…”
Section: Extending Bad And/or Good Human Cognitive Skills Through DLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is beyond any doubt that DL is contributing to improving the knowledge in several areas, some of them very difficult to interpret because of the nature of obtained data, like neuroscience [39]. These advances are expanding the frontiers of verifiable knowledge beyond classic human standards.…”
Section: Extending Bad And/or Good Human Cognitive Skills Through DLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While CNN methods can learn local and contextual features, they have difficulty utilizing global location features from the whole-brain range at high resolution, resulting in over-segmentation for other regions with similar local features. To locate brain structures, Iqbal et al (2019) segmented and classified the mouse brain into eight regions using Mask r-cnn (He et al, 2017), while the detected box has excessive redundancies for the region with complex shape. Chen et al (2019) combined a patchbased CNN and registration to segment the murine brainstem, whereas the accuracy of segmentation is easily affected by the effect of registration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large projects which include the Mouse Brain Architecture project [4], the Allen Mouse Brain Connectivity Atlas [5] and the Mouse Connectome project map the mouse brain [6] in terms of cell types, long-range connectivity patterns and microcircuit connectivity. In addition to the large-scale collaborative, currently an increasing number of laboratories are also developing independent automated, or semi-automated framework for processing brain data obtained in specific projects [7][8][9][10][11][12]. With the improvement of experimental methods for dissection of connectivity and function, development of a standardized and automated computational pipeline to map, analyze, visualize and share brain data has become the major challenge to all such efforts [1,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though some frameworks can register certain type of brain slab that contains complete coronal outlines in a way of slice by slice [7,[23][24][25], it remains very difficult to register small brain block without obvious anatomical outlines. As neural network has emerged as a technique of choice for image processing [26][27][28][29], deep learning-based brain mapping methods are also recently reported to directly provide segmentation/annotation of primary regions for 3D brain dataset [12,[30][31][32][33]. Such deep-learning-based segmentation networks are efficient in extracting pixel-level features, and thus are little dependent on the presence of global features, such as complete anatomical outlines, making it better suited for processing incomplete brain data, as compared to registration-based methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%