2011
DOI: 10.18848/1833-1874/cgp/v05i06/38232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Collaborative Design Toolkit for the Personalisation of Running Shoes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inherently, the cost of an artisanal product is higher than a mass-produced counterpart. However, customer willingness to pay for a personalised shoe is only 10-30% more than a mass-produced one (Head 2012). A major reason of interest in personalisation is the customers' need of proper fit and comfort.…”
Section: Knitted Footwear Personalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inherently, the cost of an artisanal product is higher than a mass-produced counterpart. However, customer willingness to pay for a personalised shoe is only 10-30% more than a mass-produced one (Head 2012). A major reason of interest in personalisation is the customers' need of proper fit and comfort.…”
Section: Knitted Footwear Personalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The YourStep toolkit, a web-based service, consisted of collecting personal data connected to running, such as users' measurements, colour preferences, etc. in order to personalise the running shoes to be purchased (Head & Porter 2011).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Design Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are relevant to academia within three distinct areas of design research, woven textiles, footwear and craft-based design. In footwear, current research commonly focuses on efficiency (Antemie et al 2012;Joneja and Kit 2013;Liao and Jiang 2008;Maurtua et al 2012) and/or function and performance (Davidson 2012;Head and Porter 2011;Sterzing et al 2013;Vinet and Caine 2011) and is commonly conducted within the sciences and engineering. In contrast, this research contributes a creative perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%