Developing a concept for external audits of psychosocial risks in certified occupational health and safety management systems

Abstract

a b s t r a c tPsychosocial risks are closely related to work organization, management and organizational context. Therefore, the nature of psychosocial risks is complex and differs from more traditional OHS risks. The OHSAS 18001 standard explicitly claims to deal with all OHS risks, including psychosocial risks, and the audit is a key element in OHS management systems. However, the literature indicates that audits of psychosocial risk management are difficult and multifaceted, and the available practice excludes psychosocial risks from audits. Based on an analysis of the literature and available methodological approaches, we propose a new conceptual model for audits of psychosocial risk management. The model is grounded in the British ''Guidance on the management of psychosocial risks in the workplace" (BSI, 2011), which has recently been developed to remedy the shortcomings of the OHSAS standard. The model builds on an interpretation of audit evidence that includes an integration of general scientific knowledge regarding psychosocial risks with local contextual knowledge. A key tool for the application of the integration is realistic evaluation, which provides the opportunity to assess the link between psychosocial risk management measures and expected outcomes. Another important tool is the qualitative interview, which is the primary method for data collection. The concept has important implications for the dominant audit practice and auditor competencies. It leads to an expanded knowledge base and a broader concept of audit evidence that further presupposes considerable auditor resources, and changes the required knowledge base and skills of auditors.

Occupational Health and Safety Reporting in the Top 100 Australian Companies: Does Organisational Risk Profile Matter?

“…Typical reporting of OHS data includes accident and injury rates, compensation claims and, if relevant, fatalities. Contemporary models of OHS are more comprehensive in their consideration of workers' health and wellbeing and include the full range of environmental factors that influence workers, including the physical and psychosocial aspects of work (Macdonald 2012;Jespersen and Hasle 2017). However, identifying and then reporting these factors remains more limited than the traditional workplace OHS hazards, as found in the current study and consistent with previous findings (Macdonald and Oakman 2015;Oakman et al 2018).…”

Salud y seguridad psicológicas en el trabajo: gestión de peligros y riesgos psicosociales. Panorama investigativo y normativo

“…(Potter et al, 2019) Desarrollar un concepto para auditorías externas de riesgos psicosociales en sistemas certificados de gestión de seguridad y salud ocupacional Este artículo presenta una metodología para la auditoría de la gestión de riesgos psicosociales basada en el estándar PAS 1010 y considerando los principios clave de las auditorías. (Jespersen & Hasle, 2017) Fuente: elaboración propia.…”

A Conceptual Framework for Knowledge Management of Integrated Design and Construction Phase Audit Process on Infrastructure Project Based on Risk, Using WBS, BIM and Web to Enhance Construction Safety Performance

“…Risk management for program is a methodological process of identifying, analyzing, responding to, and controlling risks that may occur during a program implementation. Risk management is related with the goal to increase the possibility and/or positive risk impacts as well as reducing the possibility and/or negative risk impacts to optimize the success of a program (Helbo andHasle 2017, Park et al 2022). Risk management is a crucial part of the decisionmaking process in construction project management that will affect scope, time, integration, quality, human resources, cost, communications, and project procurement.…”