Supervision is now recognized as a health-service psychology (HSP) core functional competency. However, supervision knowledge/skill acquisition, evaluation, and maintenance generally receive less attention than other core competencies. Knowledge/skill acquisition and evaluation are usually based on a single didactic course; typically, minimal practicum experience and direct "supervision of supervision" are provided. Supervision is barely covered on the national licensing exam. Furthermore, most jurisdictions do not require postlicensure continuing education in supervision. Once psychologists are licensed, they can supervise automatically and immediately. The current situation is problematic because emerging evidence suggests suboptimal supervision may be prevalent. Thus, a maladaptive feedback loop is maintained in which insufficiently trained supervisors provide suboptimal supervision to trainees, who then enter the field and replicate that with which they are familiar. This may have deleterious clinical, ethical, and legal implications. The present paper provides a framework for preparing HSP trainees more intentionally for entry-level practice in supervision.
Public Significance StatementSupervision is a core competency within health-service psychology. The present paper's findings indicate that supervision training, evaluation, and maintenance are less rigorous than for other competencies. It is argued that this has potentially negative clinical, ethical, and legal implications. A recommendation for better preparing students/trainees for entry-level practice is provided.