2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3042261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Reassembling Algorithm for Broken Objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of method is more sensitive to parameters and threshold values, and setting the size of a single neighborhood for different areas of the point cloud is not suitable for identifying features. Compared with the method in Jia et al [14], the recognition rate of the method in this paper is relatively decreased because of the generation of some false feature points caused by the redundancy of feature points when selecting the parameters by the multi-scale neighborhood method. The sensitivity to noise is relatively increased because the proposed method in Jia et al [14] used the multi-scale neighborhood method to calculate the point cloud features.…”
Section: Results Of Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This type of method is more sensitive to parameters and threshold values, and setting the size of a single neighborhood for different areas of the point cloud is not suitable for identifying features. Compared with the method in Jia et al [14], the recognition rate of the method in this paper is relatively decreased because of the generation of some false feature points caused by the redundancy of feature points when selecting the parameters by the multi-scale neighborhood method. The sensitivity to noise is relatively increased because the proposed method in Jia et al [14] used the multi-scale neighborhood method to calculate the point cloud features.…”
Section: Results Of Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Compared with the method in Jia et al [14], the recognition rate of the method in this paper is relatively decreased because of the generation of some false feature points caused by the redundancy of feature points when selecting the parameters by the multi-scale neighborhood method. The sensitivity to noise is relatively increased because the proposed method in Jia et al [14] used the multi-scale neighborhood method to calculate the point cloud features. Furthermore, the proposed method not only reduces the parameter setting, but also improves the robustness to noise at a certain degree, which effectively enhances the adaptability of the algorithm.…”
Section: Results Of Comparison With Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For more accurate selection of sample subsets, Jia C.Q. etc (Jia C.Q., 2020) adds three improvements to this method: 1) Setting the best matching degree during the iteration; 2) After ensuring a minimum subset of three, adding only one pair of feature matching point pairs for verification based on the smallest subset, ensuring that only four pairs of feature matching points need to be computed each time; 3) The correct point pairs already computed will not appear in subsequent iterations. The improved method can further reduce the amount of computation and improve the efficiency of the algorithm.…”
Section: Finding Neighbouring Fragmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%