2017
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2017.1341956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Systematic Approach to Evaluate and Predict Building Service Life

Abstract: Analyzing the reasonable service life of buildings is a critical step to evaluate the decision for building utilization, reuse, or disposal. If buildings manifest service value, sustainable refurbishment and reuse methods can be employed to extend their service life. Previous studies on building service life largely focused on physical obsolescence. Few studies have analyzed other aspects. The objective of the present study was to propose a systematic approach to evaluate and predict the reasonable service lif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most popular hybrid MCDM methods demonstrate the advantages over traditional ones to solve complicated problems which involve stakeholder preferences, interconnected or contradictory criteria, and uncertain environments. Decision-makers could use multi-criteria decision-making methods [46] such as analytic hierarchy process [47], fuzzy analytic hierarchy process [48,49], fuzzy Delphi [50], analytic network process under intuitionistic fuzzy set [51], Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) [52], simple additive weighting and game theory [53], discrete two persons' zero-sum matrix game theory [54], Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS), COPRAS, TOPSIS [55], as well as developing original models [56].…”
Section: Multi-criteria Methods and Construction Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular hybrid MCDM methods demonstrate the advantages over traditional ones to solve complicated problems which involve stakeholder preferences, interconnected or contradictory criteria, and uncertain environments. Decision-makers could use multi-criteria decision-making methods [46] such as analytic hierarchy process [47], fuzzy analytic hierarchy process [48,49], fuzzy Delphi [50], analytic network process under intuitionistic fuzzy set [51], Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) [52], simple additive weighting and game theory [53], discrete two persons' zero-sum matrix game theory [54], Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS), COPRAS, TOPSIS [55], as well as developing original models [56].…”
Section: Multi-criteria Methods and Construction Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the accelerated tests are quite expensive. There are also some other approaches to predict SL by considering service life models and obsolescence factors [1,34]. This method can be used for existing buildings or to be built buildings with the same material.…”
Section: Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature (Chen et al, 2017), the reinforcement corrosion is mainly related to the diameter of the steel bar, the thickness of the protective layer, the strength of the concrete, and the width of the rust crack.…”
Section: Neural Network Model For Prediction Of Reinforcement Corrosimentioning
confidence: 99%