2018
DOI: 10.1002/sres.2561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Systemic Program Evaluation Methodology: A Critical Systems Perspective

Abstract: In recent years, there has been an increased interest within the program evaluation field in the introduction of systems thinking concepts. However, most of these introductions have been primarily directed towards supporting the practice of evaluation and not towards making theoretical advancements. This article is focused on introducing systems thinking, and specifically perspectives and concepts from the work in critical systems thinking (CST), at a theoretical level in the program evaluation field, towards … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gates (2018) writes about using critical systems heuristics as a way of valuing within evaluations by carefully attending to inclusion, exclusion, and marginalization. Similarly, Torres-Cuello et al (2018) blend fourth-generation evaluation and boundary critique to theorize an evaluation process in which evaluators and stakeholders examine and negotiate the boundaries to be used throughout the evaluative process.…”
Section: Variations Of Systems-and Complexity-informed Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gates (2018) writes about using critical systems heuristics as a way of valuing within evaluations by carefully attending to inclusion, exclusion, and marginalization. Similarly, Torres-Cuello et al (2018) blend fourth-generation evaluation and boundary critique to theorize an evaluation process in which evaluators and stakeholders examine and negotiate the boundaries to be used throughout the evaluative process.…”
Section: Variations Of Systems-and Complexity-informed Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical realism has also been used by Mingers and Brocklesby as one of several approaches considering multi‐methodology within critical systems approaches (Jackson, 2019). There have been relatively fewer theoretical developments linking STCS and evaluation practices, yet this has still been a fruitful area of development (Eoyang & Holladay, 2013; Foote et al., 2021; Gates, 2018; Patton, 2011; Torres‐Cuello et al., 2018).…”
Section: Stcs Developments Within Social Science and Public Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the above mentioned, it is necessary to apply systems thinking in tunnel engineering learning and teaching. Systems thinking is also beneficial in program evaluation design [14]. In general, a well-designed evaluation mode is with the following features: the key points of assessment should match the teaching content; the modes of evaluation are flexible, diverse and incentive; the execution of assessment is planned in the teaching time schedule.…”
Section: E Well-designed Evaluating Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systems thinking is applied as a tool, such as in teaching preparation [9], course design [10]. More recently, systems thinking is used in planning course execution procedure in details, such as in terms of test [11], group work [12,13] and program evaluation [14]. But there is no report on the application in the teaching preparation of tunnel engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%