2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing a Web-Based Congress: The 2020 International Web-Based Neurosurgery Congress Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SIPS conference was not the only virtual conference to see a general high retention rates across multi-day conferences ( Fulcher et al, 2020 ; Stamelou et al, 2021 ; Weiniger and Matot, 2021 ; Kim et al, 2022 ) with some reporting an increase in attendance compared to in-person meetings from previous years ( Counsell et al, 2020 ; Fulcher et al, 2020 ; Stefanoudis et al, 2021 ; Weiniger and Matot, 2021 ). However, other conferences held during the COVID-19 pandemic that distributed post-conference surveys did not present an objective assessment of percentage of attendees that could and could not have attended an in-person conference if offered ( Ruiz-Barrera et al, 2021 ; Kim et al, 2022 ). Over a third of the attendees who completed the SIPS survey were only able to join because the conference was offered virtually.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SIPS conference was not the only virtual conference to see a general high retention rates across multi-day conferences ( Fulcher et al, 2020 ; Stamelou et al, 2021 ; Weiniger and Matot, 2021 ; Kim et al, 2022 ) with some reporting an increase in attendance compared to in-person meetings from previous years ( Counsell et al, 2020 ; Fulcher et al, 2020 ; Stefanoudis et al, 2021 ; Weiniger and Matot, 2021 ). However, other conferences held during the COVID-19 pandemic that distributed post-conference surveys did not present an objective assessment of percentage of attendees that could and could not have attended an in-person conference if offered ( Ruiz-Barrera et al, 2021 ; Kim et al, 2022 ). Over a third of the attendees who completed the SIPS survey were only able to join because the conference was offered virtually.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual conferences during the COVID-19 pandemic devised different ways to incorporate networking in order to create some semblance of in-person conferences ( Veldhuizen et al, 2020 ; Bhargava et al, 2021 ; Zaver et al, 2021 ; Kim et al, 2022 ). There were conferences that described similar functions to the SIPS Conference virtual platform including private chat functions and chat feature during sessions ( Holman et al, 2021 ; Ruiz-Barrera et al, 2021 ). Other conferences were unable to incorporate poster sessions due to the limitations in their virtual platform ( Bosslet et al, 2020 ; Ostler et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The silver lining has been the timing of the pandemic, when technology and telecommunication have advanced at their summit and have been exploited to their maximum. 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical congresses facilitating learning and networking of the community have been postponed or cancelled [14] , or organized as virtual or hybrid events with the help of digital technologies [15] . On the other hand, medical congresses experimenting with web-based delivery methods to tackle Covid-19 challenges have reported even higher number of participants and more diverse global audience compared to pre-pandemic face-to-face congress arrangements [16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%