2019
DOI: 10.25304/rlt.v27.2125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and evaluating virtual anatomy resources for teaching allied health disciplines

Abstract: Allied health professionals require an understanding of anatomy for purposes such as planning radiotherapy, or treating muscle imbalance. In practice, they will rarely see the structure they are treating, but seeing it during their education is invaluable. To reveal deep structures in the human body, neighbouring structures are unavoidably removed as a donated human body is dissected. Academic and clinical staff approached the challenge for students' understanding of the male reproductive and urinary system, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resource review: Existing literature described the process of creating toolkits but lacked evidence of ongoing review and responsiveness to the contemporary needs of clinical educators. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] e task force prioritized creation of a transparent resource review process to establish a mechanism for the addition of new resources and to articulate to contributors and users how each resource was reviewed. e evaluation criteria are broad to capture relevant content that is evidenced based as well as content created by CIs based on their personal clinical teaching experiences.…”
Section: Profile Of the Current CI Toolkitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Resource review: Existing literature described the process of creating toolkits but lacked evidence of ongoing review and responsiveness to the contemporary needs of clinical educators. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] e task force prioritized creation of a transparent resource review process to establish a mechanism for the addition of new resources and to articulate to contributors and users how each resource was reviewed. e evaluation criteria are broad to capture relevant content that is evidenced based as well as content created by CIs based on their personal clinical teaching experiences.…”
Section: Profile Of the Current CI Toolkitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of publication, the CI Toolkit contains 160 resources, organized into 5 Existing literature describing health professions toolkits focused on interprofessional education, 20 didactic content teaching resources, 21 diagnosis-specific provider service delivery guides, 22,23 and student CE resources [24][25][26] rather than teaching resources for CIs. One study explored the needs for a Web-based CE resources for preceptors and created online clinical teaching modules based on the identified needs from the survey, similar to the CI Toolkit development process.…”
Section: Profile Of the Current CI Toolkitmentioning
confidence: 99%