1989
DOI: 10.1177/002248718904000202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing and Sustaining Critical Reflection in Teacher Education

Abstract: Smyth provides background informa tion on the emergence of reflectivity as a conceptual thrust in teacher education. He also discusses some of the impedi ments to empowerment that teachers and teacher educators confront as they attempt to implement critical reflection in their curricula. Smyth concludes that if teachers (and teacher educators) are going to uncover the forces that inhibit and constrain them, they need to en gage in four forms of action with respect to teaching. These "forms" are charac terized … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
177
0
39

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
177
0
39
Order By: Relevance
“…Pupil feedback is also an area which students need to recognise as an important lens through which to view their practice. A more systematic approach to garnering learner feedback may support the development of greater reflective skills, and enable students to describe, inform, confront and restructure their teaching (Smyth, 1989). It is intended to explore different types of feedback explicitly with future cohorts of teaching students in order that they may fully exploit the potential of the use of different types of feedback to direct their reflections, as an integral part of their practice, rather than as a separate process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pupil feedback is also an area which students need to recognise as an important lens through which to view their practice. A more systematic approach to garnering learner feedback may support the development of greater reflective skills, and enable students to describe, inform, confront and restructure their teaching (Smyth, 1989). It is intended to explore different types of feedback explicitly with future cohorts of teaching students in order that they may fully exploit the potential of the use of different types of feedback to direct their reflections, as an integral part of their practice, rather than as a separate process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all the students who were interviewed talked about different methods they had used to obtain feedback from the pupils, demonstrating that they were using pupils' responses as a means of identifying issues and informing their subsequent planning (Smyth 1989). The feedback could be classified in two ways: explicit feedback, where the student asked the pupils to respond non-verbally, verbally or in writing, and implicit feedback, where the student used observation to assess pupils' learning.…”
Section: Learner Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rather than a focus on purely evaluative evidence, practitioner-derived knowledge must be considered trustworthy and relevant in research (Lerman, 1994;Smyth, 1989b). This study intended to value practitionerderived knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para ultrapassar tais dificuldades, Smyth (1989) sugere a realização de perguntas de índole pedagógica: (i) Descrição: o que faço? O que penso?…”
Section: Conhecimento Didático E Reflexãounclassified