2021
DOI: 10.1109/jsyst.2020.3020078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Cost-Effective Rumor-Refuting Strategy Through Game-Theoretic Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although misinformation is broadly a kind of information, there are some differences between the processes of information dissemination and misinformation spread. e biggest difference is that the former emphasizes a unilateral diffusion process, i.e., information dissemination models seldom consider the situation that people refuse to acquire information (see [14,[20][21][22], for some examples), whereas the latter emphasizes a competitive process between misinformation and the truth, i.e., misinformation spread models usually account for the situation that some people believe misinformation; meanwhile, some people believe the truth (see [13,15,23], for some examples). erefore, information dissemination models may not be very suitable to characterize the effect of countermeasures on containing misinformation spread.…”
Section: Misinformation Spread Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although misinformation is broadly a kind of information, there are some differences between the processes of information dissemination and misinformation spread. e biggest difference is that the former emphasizes a unilateral diffusion process, i.e., information dissemination models seldom consider the situation that people refuse to acquire information (see [14,[20][21][22], for some examples), whereas the latter emphasizes a competitive process between misinformation and the truth, i.e., misinformation spread models usually account for the situation that some people believe misinformation; meanwhile, some people believe the truth (see [13,15,23], for some examples). erefore, information dissemination models may not be very suitable to characterize the effect of countermeasures on containing misinformation spread.…”
Section: Misinformation Spread Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the influences of knowledge popularization and expert education on individuals are independent, then, at any time t ∈ [0, τ], the neutral individual v i and the misinformation-believing individual v k will transfer to the truth-believing state at the average rates of f(u 0 (t)) + 􏽐 M l�1 b il g(u l (t)) and c[f(u 0 (t)) + 􏽐 M l�1 b kl g(u l (t))], respectively. According to the modeling idea of individual-level epidemic theory [15,23,35], the evolution of individual states over time follows a continuous-time Markov chain. At any time t ∈ [0, τ], the transfer rates among the individual v i s states are as follows:…”
Section: Misinformation Spread Model Under a Cra Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Etesami and Başar (2016) investigated a competitive transmission game for multi-information competition and communication over undirected networks. Recently, Huang et al (2020) introduced a differential gametheoretic model by estimating the expected net utility of rumormongers and the expected loss of rumor victims. Moreover, it is typical to explicitly model people's utility in order to understand the decision-making process under various human factors (such as cognitive behavior, psychology, neighbour influence) and popularity of information.…”
Section: Rumor Psychological Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Q UANTITATIVE analysis of stochastic processes such as rumor and (mis-)information spreading over physical and online social networks (SNs) has stimulated intense research activities [1], [2]. Owing to the pervasive use of social media and the abundance of data extracted from several such networks, which for long were merely unavailable, the theoretical perception of epidemic dynamics driven by nodal interactions has refined substantially in recent years [3], [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%