1999
DOI: 10.1080/0885625990140204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing literacy in families with histories of reading problems: preliminary results from a longitudinal study of young children of dyslexic parents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison group selected had in spite of being at familial risk for dyslexia developed normal literacy skills. The at-risk children were recruited through newspapers and public health centres and were drawn from 140 families where at least one parent and one other relative was dyslexic (the design and sampling methods of the at-risk children and their families are described in detail elsewhere; see Hagtvet 1997;Hagtvet et al, 1998). The present study presents the reading outcome in a follow-up assessment conducted when these children were 10 years old.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison group selected had in spite of being at familial risk for dyslexia developed normal literacy skills. The at-risk children were recruited through newspapers and public health centres and were drawn from 140 families where at least one parent and one other relative was dyslexic (the design and sampling methods of the at-risk children and their families are described in detail elsewhere; see Hagtvet 1997;Hagtvet et al, 1998). The present study presents the reading outcome in a follow-up assessment conducted when these children were 10 years old.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The children with dyslexia were drawn from the Oslo Longitudinal Study of Dyslexia, which had followed children born at familial risk for dyslexia from age 2 years through third grade (for more details, see Hagtvet et al, 1998). A follow-up assessment was conducted when these children were in fifth grade, with an average age 10 years 7 months old.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%