2020
DOI: 10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v7i2.6314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Module for Two-Dimensional Course Based on Ethnomathematics for Fourth Grade of Elementary School Student

Abstract: This research was conducted due to the limitation of independent instructional media for students that is based on the curriculum as a companion to mathematics textbooks. Where the textbooks do not connect mathematics with local culture, so that students are less familiar with their culture. This research aims to develop a valid, practical, and effective module for two-dimensional course based on ethnomathematics for fourth grade students of elementary school. The model employed in this development research wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
0
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
0
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows that the Google Classroom used falls within the criteria of being very feasible and can be used or applied in learning at school. This is in accordance with research by Adelina and Triwahyuningtyas et al (2020), the results of the Google Classroom feasibility percentage based on the expert assessment results were 88.55%, falling into the feasible category. However, there is still something that needs to be improved based on suggestions and comments provided by expert validators and practitioners.…”
Section: Google Classroom Eligibilitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This shows that the Google Classroom used falls within the criteria of being very feasible and can be used or applied in learning at school. This is in accordance with research by Adelina and Triwahyuningtyas et al (2020), the results of the Google Classroom feasibility percentage based on the expert assessment results were 88.55%, falling into the feasible category. However, there is still something that needs to be improved based on suggestions and comments provided by expert validators and practitioners.…”
Section: Google Classroom Eligibilitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Jadual 2: Kajian Mengikut Negara Berdasarkan kepada Rajah 2, dapat disimpulkan bahawa kajian empirikal terpilih paling banyak dilaksanakan di negara Indonesia berjumlah 30 kajian (Aini et al, 2018;Budiarto et al, 2019;Farokhah et al, 2017;Fendrikfendrik et al, 2020;Fitriyah et al, 2018;Hakim et al, 2020;Dewi Herawaty et al, 2020;Kusuma et al, 2019;Kusumaningsih et al, 2020;Lena et al, 2019;Mauluah & Marsigit, 2019;Muhammad et al, 2019;Mukeriyanto et al, 2020;Nursyahidah et al, 2018;Pinheiro, 2020;Rohaeti et al, 2020;Roza et al, 2020;Septianawati et al, 2017;Sowanto & Mulyadin, 2019;Susiana et al, 2020;Triwahyuningtyas et al, 2020;Ulya & Rahayu, 2018;Utami et al, 2020;Vitoria & Monawati, 2020;Widada et al, 2019;Widada, Herawaty, Andriyani, et al, 2020;Widada, Herawaty, Beka, et al, 2020;Yunian Putra & Indriani, 2017). Kajian mengikut negara memang yang paling banyak di Indonesia akan tetapi jumlah negara yang ada daripada keseluruhan artikel yang dianalisis ialah sebanyak 10 negara.…”
Section: Farokhah Et Al (2017)unclassified
“…Rajah 3: Analisis dari aspek tahun terbit Seterusnya berdasarkan tahun keluar dari 2010 sehingga 2020, tahun 2020 menjadi tahun yang paling banyak menerbitkan artikel yang berkaitan dengan Etnomatematik (Fendrikfendrik et al, 2020;Hakim et al, 2020;Dewi Herawaty et al, 2020;Kusumaningsih et al, 2020;Mukeriyanto et al, 2020;Pinheiro, 2020;Rohaeti et al, 2020;Roza et al, 2020;Shahbari & Daher, 2020;Sunzuma & Maharaj, 2020;Susiana et al, 2020;Triwahyuningtyas et al, 2020;Utami et al, 2020;Widada, Herawaty, Andriyani et al, 2020;Widada, Herawaty, Beka et al, 2020) Jika merujuk kepada pendekatan kaedah yang digunakan dalam kajian-kajian yang telah dijalankan, kaedah kualitatif menjadi kaedah yang paling banyak digunakan sebanyak 43% (Budiarto et al, 2019;Fendrikfendrik et al, 2020;Hakim et al, 2020;Karen François & Charoula Stathopoulou, 2012;Kusumaningsih et al, 2020;Mauluah & Marsigit, 2019;Mohamad et al, 2011;Muhammad et al, 2019;Nursyahidah et al, 2018;Pinheiro, 2020;Roza et al, 2020;Septianawati et al, 2017;Susiana et al, 2020;Ulya & Rahayu, 2018;Utami et al, 2020;Widada et al, 2019;Yunian Putra & Indriani, 2017), manakala kaedah selanjutnya yang banyak digunakan ialah penyelidikan dan pembangunan dengan 40% dari total kajian (Aini et al, 2018;Fitriyah et al, 2018;Dewi Herawaty et al, 2020;Lena et al, 2019;…”
Section: Farokhah Et Al (2017)unclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations