Developing patient-centered teams: The role of sharing stories about patients and patient care.

Bennett, A. E.; Hassinger, J.; Martin, Lisa; Harris, Lisa H.; Gold, Marji

doi:10.1037/fsh0000106

Cited by 11 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Team processes (e.g. trust, reflection) are also triggered by sharing experiences, such as clinical cases and stories, thoughts of the day [280,282]. All seven studies showed improvements in non-technical skills and had a very low level of evidence.…”

Section: Triggering Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: A high variety of team interventions aims to improve team performance outcomes. In 2008, we conducted a systematic review to provide an overview of the scientific studies focused on these interventions. However, over the past decade, the literature on team interventions has rapidly evolved. An updated overview is therefore required, and it will focus on all possible team interventions without restrictions to a type of intervention, setting, or research design. Objectives: To review the literature from the past decade on interventions with the goal of improving team effectiveness within healthcare organizations and identify the "evidence base" levels of the research. Methods: Seven major databases were systematically searched for relevant articles published between 2008 and July 2018. Of the original search yield of 6025 studies, 297 studies met the inclusion criteria according to three independent authors and were subsequently included for analysis. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Scale was used to assess the level of empirical evidence. Results: Three types of interventions were distinguished: (1) Training, which is subdivided into training that is based on predefined principles (i.e. CRM: crew resource management and TeamSTEPPS: Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety), on a specific method (i.e. simulation), or on general team training. (2) Tools covers tools that structure (i.e. SBAR: Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation, (de)briefing checklists, and rounds), facilitate (through communication technology), or trigger (through monitoring and feedback) teamwork. (3) Organizational (re)design is about (re)designing structures to stimulate team processes and team functioning. (4) A programme is a combination of the previous types. The majority of studies evaluated a training focused on the (acute) hospital care setting. Most of the evaluated interventions focused on improving non-technical skills and provided evidence of improvements. Conclusion: Over the last decade, the number of studies on team interventions has increased exponentially. At the same time, research tends to focus on certain interventions, settings, and/or outcomes. Principle-based training (i.e. CRM and TeamSTEPPS) and simulation-based training seem to provide the greatest opportunities for reaching the improvement goals in team functioning.

show abstract

Section: Triggering Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This can help reduce feelings of isolation, identify best approaches to PCV, and strengthen providers' commitment to patient-centred care. 43…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The option to look: patient-centred pregnancy tissue viewing at independent abortion clinics in the United States

Hann

Becker

2020

Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abortion providers' approaches to patient-centred pregnancy tissue viewing (PCV)when a patient requests to see their products of conceptionis understudied in abortion care. This mixed-method study aimed to identify: (1) if, when, and how PCV is facilitated at US independent abortion clinics; (2) how staff are trained to offer viewing; and (3) provider experiences facilitating PCV. We surveyed administrators from 22 independent abortion clinics affiliated with the Abortion Care Network about their PCV practices and then completed in-depth semi-structured interviews with 25 providers to better understand their experiences facilitating PCV. Results indicate that most of the clinics that provide PCV do so by patient request. A variety of providers facilitate viewing, including counsellors, educators, physicians, nurses, and medical assistants. Timing, viewing location, and staff training vary by facility. Benefits of and barriers to PCV emerged through three themes: (1) patient-centred care;(2) misinformation about fetal tissue; and (3) personal navigations as providers. Providers and administrators report PCV aligns with their patient-centred clinic missions and offers patients opportunities for choice, closure, and access to information. Yet, anti-abortion misinformation about fetal tissue impacts the ways providers must navigate complex conversations about PCV professionally and personally. Clinic resources and concern about adverse patient reactions to identifiable fetal parts present barriers to offering viewing. Understanding providers' experiences and approaches to PCV is an important first step to developing quality practices that can be shared across clinics. The findings of this study support the need for more research and training on PCV in abortion care.

show abstract

“…The position in this continuum is determined by a shared team identity, clear roles, and goals, interdependence, integration, shared responsibility, and through the predictability, urgency, and complexity of team tasks, where teamwork, collaboration, coordination, and networking are nested in each other (Xyrichis et al, 2018). Previous studies have addressed three of the four categories of interprofessional practices: The role of teamwork has been explored in relation to the concept of delegation and in the context of teams and the degree of their patient-centredness as well as communication and co-treatment (Dini et al, 2012;Bennett et al, 2015;Donnelly et al, 2019). Coordination is increasingly playing a role to overcome sectoral boundaries in outpatient care (Burkhardt & Trojan, 2018;Gödde et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaboration amongst general practitioners and gynaecologists working in primary health care in Germany: a cross-sectional study

Trusch

Heintze

Petelos

et al. 2021

Prim Health Care Res Dev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: This cross-sectional study is the first one to explore the collaboration of the influencing factors thereof amongst general practitioners (GPs) and gynaecologists (Gyns) working in primary care in urban and rural settings in Germany. Background: The number of women aged ≥ 50 years is predicted to increase in the next years in Germany. This coincides with the ageing of primary care specialists providing outpatient care. Whereas delegation of tasks to nurses as a form of interprofessional collaboration has been the target of recent studies, there is no data regarding collaboration amongst physicians in different specialisations working in primary care. We explored collaboration amongst GPs and Gyn regarding the healthcare provision to women aged ≥ 50 years. Methods: A quantitative postal survey was administered to GPs and Gyns in three federal states in Germany, focusing on care provision to women aged ≥ 50 years. A total of 4545 physicians, comprising 3514 GPs (67% of the total GP population) randomly selected, and all 1031 Gyns practicing in these states received the postal survey in March 2018. A single reminder was sent in April 2018 with data collection ending in June 2018. Multiple logistic regressions were performed for collaboration, adjusted by age and sex, alongside descriptive methods. Findings: The overall response rate was 31% (1389 respondents): 861 GPs (25%) and 528 Gyns (51%), with the mean respondent age being 54.4 years. Seventy-two per cent were female. Key competencies of collaboration are associated with working in rural federal states and with network participation. Physicians from rural states [odds ratio (OR) = 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2, 1.9] and physicians in networks (OR = 3.0, CI = 2.3, 3.9) were more satisfied with collaboration. Collaboration to deliver services for women aged ≥ 50 years is more systematic amongst GPs and Gyns who are members of a network; increased networking could improve collaboration, and ultimately, outcomes too.

show abstract

Developing patient-centered teams: The role of sharing stories about patients and patient care.

Cited by 11 publications

References 30 publications

Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade

Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade

The option to look: patient-centred pregnancy tissue viewing at independent abortion clinics in the United States

Collaboration amongst general practitioners and gynaecologists working in primary health care in Germany: a cross-sectional study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About