2011 7th International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices 2011
DOI: 10.1109/nwesp.2011.6088211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing RDF-based Web Services for supporting runtime matchmaking and invocation

Abstract: Abstract-In our previous research, we proposed an Autonomous Matchmaking Web Services (AMWS) framework, in which Web services broker themselves to notify the service registry whether they are suitable to the service requests. This framework is designated to more efficiently work for dynamically assembling services at runtime in a massively distributed environment. The central point of the AMWS is to use RDF (Resource Description Framework) to carry all exchanging messages. However, the implementation detail ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the additional services were provided by a third party, the addition of JSON-LD-based annotations was not the appropriate solution to adopt. Based on Yu et al [9], the development of the semantic description annotation used the RDF format, with the inclusion of several sections, namely (1) namespace construction, service and operation name, as well as endpoint invocation, (2) service categorization, (3) HTTP method declarations for service calls (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, or PATCH), and (4) de nition of input and output parameters, as well as their reference models. Therefore, registered web services are exposed to several capabilities, using the RDF-based semantic description annotations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when the additional services were provided by a third party, the addition of JSON-LD-based annotations was not the appropriate solution to adopt. Based on Yu et al [9], the development of the semantic description annotation used the RDF format, with the inclusion of several sections, namely (1) namespace construction, service and operation name, as well as endpoint invocation, (2) service categorization, (3) HTTP method declarations for service calls (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, or PATCH), and (4) de nition of input and output parameters, as well as their reference models. Therefore, registered web services are exposed to several capabilities, using the RDF-based semantic description annotations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a formal form for describing service semantics has not been found due to complexity [8], several approaches to create these descriptions have been carried out. This indicates the compilation of semantic description, by adding annotations through JSON-LD [1,4], SA-REST [5] or the Resource Description Framework (RDF) [9][10][11]. According to Guodong et al [12], a knowledge graph was created by extracting the entities, attributes, and several program relationships of different structural web pages and data sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the additional services were provided by a third party, the addition of JSON-LD-based annotations was not the appropriate solution to adopt. Based on Yu et al [9], the development of the semantic description annotation used the RDF format, with the inclusion of several sections, namely (1) namespace construction, service and operation name, as well as endpoint invocation, (2) service categorization, (3) HTTP method declarations for service calls (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, or PATCH), and (4) definition of input and output parameters, as well as their reference models. Therefore, registered web services are exposed to several capabilities, using the RDF-based semantic description annotations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a formal form for describing service semantics has not been found due to complexity [8], several approaches to create these descriptions have been carried out. This indicates the compilation of semantic description, by adding annotations through JSON-LD [1][2][3][4], SA-REST [5] or the Resource Description Framework (RDF) [9][10][11]. A knowledge graph was created by extracting data from set of web pages and data sources then subsequently converted into structured data, such as triple RDF [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%