1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1984.tb00195.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Developing’ the Urban Informal Sector in South Africa: The Reformist Paradigm and its Fallacies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The association between the formal and informal sectors has also been explored in South Africa. There, research has highlighted the dominant-subordinate interactions by underscoring the fact that the informal sector should be conceptualized as a form of production and reproduction, with considerable stratification and discordant social relations, dependant upon, integrated with and subordinate to the capitalist mode of production (Wellings and Sutcliffe, 1984). Wellings and Sutcliffe have expressed skepticism about the reformist perspectives which fail to appreciate the asymmetric relationship between the formal and informal sectors.…”
Section: Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The association between the formal and informal sectors has also been explored in South Africa. There, research has highlighted the dominant-subordinate interactions by underscoring the fact that the informal sector should be conceptualized as a form of production and reproduction, with considerable stratification and discordant social relations, dependant upon, integrated with and subordinate to the capitalist mode of production (Wellings and Sutcliffe, 1984). Wellings and Sutcliffe have expressed skepticism about the reformist perspectives which fail to appreciate the asymmetric relationship between the formal and informal sectors.…”
Section: Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…During the 1980s, as in other parts of the global South, there was increasing recognition of the importance of informal economic activity in South Africa, among which shebeens were a prominent sub-sector (Rogerson & Hart, 1986;Wellings & Sutcliffe, 1984). With the transition to democracy in South Africa in the 1990s, State engagement to strengthen and transform the informal sector, so that it could contribute to job creation and poverty alleviation, became increasingly important (Rogerson, 1991).…”
Section: Economic Discourse Of Alcohol and Shebeensmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…14 Third, many inputs purchased by the petty commodity producers come from the capitalist sector and many finished products and services are sold to capitalist enterprises. 15 Since the commodities are sold to capitalist enterprises below their value while the required inputs are purchased from them at prices above their value (as a result of monopolist protection and controlled access to institutional credit, contracts and licenses), there are large transfers of value from the petty commodity sector to the capitalist sector. 16 And fourth, as LeBrun and Gerry point out, 23 Downloaded by [University of Exeter] at 05: 38 15 July 2015 subordination of petty production to capital can take rnuch more direct forrns than those which opera te through the rnarket.…”
Section: Petty Commodity Production: What Makes It Viable?mentioning
confidence: 99%