2017
DOI: 10.15287/afr.2016.770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and analysis of an opportunity cost simulation accounting for the spatial distributions of local forest management

Abstract: Nakajima T., Kanomata H., Shiraishi N., Matsumoto M., 2017. Development and analysis of an opportunity cost simulation accounting for the spatial distributions of local forest management. Ann. For. Res. 60(1): 145-159.Abstract. We describe the development of a simulation based on neighbor relationships between small stands forming many sub compartments in a forested area. We used a Geographic Information System (GIS) to simulate local forest management plans. The distribution and intensity of different silvicu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These OCs could be used as a reference to calculate compensation for owners who practice SFM in their forests, or who receive Payment for Environmental Services, with opportunity cost payments differentiated according to region. The methodology used here assists in determining the economic performance of land use (the economic and environmental components of SFM) (Naidoo and Adamowicz 2006;Adams et al 2010;Bryan et al 2011;Nakajima et al 2017). However, the adjustment required for implementing a differentiated compensation associated with OC would force a paradigm shift in the current institutional framework in Costa Rica -changes for which the country may not be ready for or interested in carrying out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These OCs could be used as a reference to calculate compensation for owners who practice SFM in their forests, or who receive Payment for Environmental Services, with opportunity cost payments differentiated according to region. The methodology used here assists in determining the economic performance of land use (the economic and environmental components of SFM) (Naidoo and Adamowicz 2006;Adams et al 2010;Bryan et al 2011;Nakajima et al 2017). However, the adjustment required for implementing a differentiated compensation associated with OC would force a paradigm shift in the current institutional framework in Costa Rica -changes for which the country may not be ready for or interested in carrying out.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta pérdida podría considerarse una referencia, con miras a calcular la compensación para quienes someten su bosque al MFS o al pago por servicios ambientales; diferenciando el reconocimiento por costo de oportunidad, de acuerdo con el lugar donde se ubique la unidad de manejo. Los resultados obtenidos muestran cómo se desenvuelven los usos del suelo, desde el punto de vista del desempeño económico del MFS (Adams et al, 2010;Bryan et al, 2011;Naidoo y Adamowicz, 2006;Nakajima et al, 2017). Así mismo, este tipo de análisis se reconoce esencial, ya que es la categoría más importante de costos en la que un país podría incurrir si reduce la tasa de pérdida de bosque.…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified
“…Thus, our research provides a strong perspective on OC for local policymakers, who can contribute toward political decision making and the evaluation of the potential of fields. This is especially meaningful, given the need for a locally adaptive regulatory framework to fulfil various climate objectives [63][64][65][66][67].…”
Section: The Opportunity Cost Of Avoided Deforestation In Southeast Amentioning
confidence: 99%