2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-012-9498-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Analytical Validation of Robust Near-Infrared Multivariate Calibration Models for the Quality Inspection Control of Mozzarella Cheese

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The greatest R 2 VAL for each predicted trait is in bold only if it is >0.50. ally, cheese content of WSN was predicted using NIRS (400-1,100 nm spectrum range) also by Kraggerud et al (2014) with modest results (R 2 CV = 0.42; RMSE of cross validation = 0.12%). Botelho et al (2013), analyzing 123 Mozzarella samples with a Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (1,000-2,500 nm spectrum range), obtained RMSE of prediction very similar to ours (2.2% for moisture and 3.2% for fat content) by using PLS regression. Considering another dairy product, Madalozzo et al (2015) tested NIRS (1,100-2,500 nm spectrum range) with PLS regression on 19 ricotta samples in duplicate and obtained results for fat and protein predictions very similar to those of Karoui et al (2006) in terms of cross-validated R 2 and to ours in terms of RMSE.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The greatest R 2 VAL for each predicted trait is in bold only if it is >0.50. ally, cheese content of WSN was predicted using NIRS (400-1,100 nm spectrum range) also by Kraggerud et al (2014) with modest results (R 2 CV = 0.42; RMSE of cross validation = 0.12%). Botelho et al (2013), analyzing 123 Mozzarella samples with a Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (1,000-2,500 nm spectrum range), obtained RMSE of prediction very similar to ours (2.2% for moisture and 3.2% for fat content) by using PLS regression. Considering another dairy product, Madalozzo et al (2015) tested NIRS (1,100-2,500 nm spectrum range) with PLS regression on 19 ricotta samples in duplicate and obtained results for fat and protein predictions very similar to those of Karoui et al (2006) in terms of cross-validated R 2 and to ours in terms of RMSE.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The most widespread is Mahalanobis distance (De Maesschalck et al, 2000), which can also be used to discard the "average" spectra (i.e., those closer to the center of the distribution) to identify the samples to be analyzed using gold-standard methods. In a few cases, other strategies were used to identify outlier samples (Čurda and Kukačková, 2004;González-Martín et al, 2011;Oca et al, 2012;Botelho et al, 2013), and some studies identified the outlier samples a posteriori and eliminated on the basis of the residuals from the calibration equation, which forced a reduction in the RMSE VAL and an increase in the R 2 VAL (Lucas et al, 2008). In any case, the effects of different sample selection strategies and outlier detection procedures on the effectiveness of the prediction equations tested by genuinely independent validation procedures is insufficiently understood.…”
Section: Sample Selection and Identification Of Outliersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This figure is calculated for the calibration and validation sets according to Eq. , where RMSE is the root mean square error of calibration or validation and SD is the standard deviation of the reference values in the calibration or validation sets . RPD=SD/RMSE …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%