2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12934-019-1185-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and application of a transcriptional sensor for detection of heterologous acrylic acid production in E. coli

Abstract: Background Acrylic acid (AA) is a widely used commodity chemical derived from non-renewable fossil fuel sources. Alternative microbial-based production methodologies are being developed with the aim of providing “green” acrylic acid. These initiatives will benefit from component sensing tools that facilitate rapid and easy detection of in vivo AA production. Results We developed a novel transcriptional sensor facilitating in vivo detection of acrylic acid (AA). RNAseq a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, TFs in prokaryotes can be grouped into a dozen families identified on the basis of sequence analysis, with the LacI, AraC, LysR, CRP, TetR, and OmpR families being characterized best (Browning and Busby, 2004). New TFs continue to be identified by experimental methods such as transcriptome analysis (Raghavan et al, 2019), onehybrid assays (Reece-Hoyes and Walhout, 2012), electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA, Hellman and Fried, 2007), DNA affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS, Tacheny et al, 2013), and protein microarrays (Hu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methods For Identifying Tfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…So far, TFs in prokaryotes can be grouped into a dozen families identified on the basis of sequence analysis, with the LacI, AraC, LysR, CRP, TetR, and OmpR families being characterized best (Browning and Busby, 2004). New TFs continue to be identified by experimental methods such as transcriptome analysis (Raghavan et al, 2019), onehybrid assays (Reece-Hoyes and Walhout, 2012), electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA, Hellman and Fried, 2007), DNA affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS, Tacheny et al, 2013), and protein microarrays (Hu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methods For Identifying Tfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TFs can be used to detect small molecules, ion accumulation, and changes in physiological parameters. A wide variety of TF-based biosensors have been constructed and characterized that recognize different small molecules, including but not limited to glutarate (Thompson et al, 2019), 3-hydroxypropionic acid (Rogers and Church, 2016;Seok et al, 2018;Nguyen et al, 2019), itaconic acid (Hanko et al, 2018), flavonoids (Siedler et al, 2014a;Trabelsi et al, 2018), anhydrotetracycline (Lutz and Bujard, 1997), arabinose (Lee and Keasling, 2006), lactam (Zhang et al, 2016), mevalonate (Tang and Cirino, 2011), L-methionine (Mustafi et al, 2012), amino acids (Binder et al, 2012;Mustafi et al, 2012;Leavitt et al, 2016), acrylic acid (Raghavan et al, 2019), isoprene (Kim et al, 2018), shikimate , and aromatic compounds (Willardson et al, 1998;Kim et al, 2005;Jha et al, 2016). Some typical biosensors with sensing kinetics are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Monitoring Metabolites In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations