2011
DOI: 10.1118/1.3590357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and characterization of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based upon region-growing algorithm

Abstract: A new algorithm for computer simulation of breast anatomy has been proposed that improved the realism of the anthropomorphic software breast phantom.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
110
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4] They provide a practical means to perform studies that would otherwise be difficult or impossible with human subjects due to the high cost or risks to patient safety. For these phantoms to be truly useful in optimizing and comparing different modalities, it is essential to be able to simulate the breast in the various positions and states of compression that the modalities require.…”
Section: A Breast Phantomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] They provide a practical means to perform studies that would otherwise be difficult or impossible with human subjects due to the high cost or risks to patient safety. For these phantoms to be truly useful in optimizing and comparing different modalities, it is essential to be able to simulate the breast in the various positions and states of compression that the modalities require.…”
Section: A Breast Phantomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the software breast phantoms developed by Bakic et al [5]. These phantoms include all the primary breast tissues such as adipose tissue, fibroglandular tissue, Cooper's ligaments and skin.…”
Section: Modeling Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software phantoms can be applied to know the feasibility of a wide range of studies as: simulation of multimodality imaging systems [Diekmann et al, 2009;Bakic et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2011;Chui et al, 2012], evaluation of breast dosimetry [Dance et al, 2005;Zhou et al, 2006;Ma et al, 2009;Sechopoulos et al, 2012], or evaluation of registration techniques [Richard et al, 2006].…”
Section: Software Breast Phantomsmentioning
confidence: 99%