2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and characterization of zirconia–alumina composites for orthopedic implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
54
1
10

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
54
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Sequeira et al [49] pointed the use of two inorganic oxides, zirconia and alumina, as potential candidates to be used in the orthopedic implantology field. A biocompatible material for such purpose may be obtained combining these two materials, since the stiffness and long-term stability of alumina is merged to the chemical stability and mechanical strength of zirconia.…”
Section: Orthopedic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequeira et al [49] pointed the use of two inorganic oxides, zirconia and alumina, as potential candidates to be used in the orthopedic implantology field. A biocompatible material for such purpose may be obtained combining these two materials, since the stiffness and long-term stability of alumina is merged to the chemical stability and mechanical strength of zirconia.…”
Section: Orthopedic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main phases in this composite are tetragonal zirconia and α‐alumina with a low amount of secondary phases. The presence of these two former phases is extremely favorable for different applications, in particular for biomedical applications . Furthermore, the pressureless sintering of powders in air offer a cheaper and easier manufacturing process compared with conventional procedures .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alumina-zirconia composites, which combined the high hardness of alumina and the excellent fracture resistance of zirconia, are extensively used as an efficient alternative to monoclinic zirconia and alumina in a wide range of applications. [1][2][3] Indeed the main drawback of monoclinic zirconia is its aging due to the tetragonal to monoclinic transformation when exposed to hydrothermal conditions. On the other hand, several studies also indicated that monolithic alumina ceramics failure is due to low resistance to crack propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent advances in ceramic matrix composites reinforced with a second phase have shown potential in improving the properties of monolithic ceramics by increasing their hardness, fracture toughness, and wear strength . Among the materials used for the reinforcement of ceramic matrices, nanocrystalline alumina (Al 2 O 3 ) and metallic carbides (such as TiC, SiC, WC, NbC, TaC, HfC, and ZrC) are promising . These materials have high hardness, elastic modulus, and melting point and thus play an important role in the wear performance of 3Y‐TZP‐based composites in applications such as bearings, cutting tools, and punching and stamping dies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%