2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.115903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and comparative evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD and N based ELISA tests in various African endemic settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential for ecological fallacy plus the high between-dataset heterogeneity should add extra caution to the interpretation of the results of the presented meta-analyses. Nevertheless, the more limited individual sample level data available also agree with the main findings regarding malaria [30] and HIV. Third, some analyses include datasets that represent the same samples tested with different assays, therefore they are not entirely independent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The potential for ecological fallacy plus the high between-dataset heterogeneity should add extra caution to the interpretation of the results of the presented meta-analyses. Nevertheless, the more limited individual sample level data available also agree with the main findings regarding malaria [30] and HIV. Third, some analyses include datasets that represent the same samples tested with different assays, therefore they are not entirely independent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This ELISA was developed in Tunisia and its performance was tested in different African settings with variable endemicity. In fact, we participated in the evaluation and validation of this in-house ELISA [ 34 ]. The sensitivity of the anti-N IgG ELISA test was 92% and specificity 94%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to detect SARS-CoV-2 exposure in the study participants, we combined two sources of information: the positive results of RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 [ 30 ] and/or detection of antibodies to the N protein by in-house ELISA test [ 31 ], prior to inclusion in the cohort or during the post-vaccination follow-up. Of note, for inactivated vaccine recipients, only positive PCRs for SARS-CoV-2 were considered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We optimized the entire upstream and downstream process for the production of the RBD spike S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan-hu-1 strain) using Sf9 insect cells/baculovirus vector expression system (BEVS) in order to develop an ELISA assay [ 32 ]. The developed ELISA to detect S-RBD-specific IgG antibodies was validated and cross-validated in various endemic African settings [ 31 ]. Briefly, serum samples were diluted at 1:400 in PBS-0.01% Tween 20 (PBS-T), and then incubated in ELISA plates (Maxisorp Nunc, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, MA, USA) coated with recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S–RBD protein (2 µg/mL, 50 µL/well).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%