2018
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2017.09.0324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Comparison of Soil Water Release Curves for Three Soils in the Red River Valley

Abstract: Core Ideas Soil water release curve is important but difficult to measure. HYPROP and WP4 are used to develop the soil water release curves for three soils. HYPROP and WP4 provided a good and simple way to measure soil water release curves. A soil water release curve (SWRC) describes the critical and soil‐specific relationship between soil water content and matric potential. In this study, soil moisture and corresponding matric potentials were measured using (1) a new method by HYPROP and WP4 dewpoint potentio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The field bulk density of the soil during the soil collection was 1.25 g/cm 3 , and it was determined by the soil core method [31]. A soil water release curve (SWRC) was constructed using the combined datasets from the HYPROP ® evaporation method (UMS GmbH, Munich, Germany) and the WP4 dewpoint potentiometer (Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA, USA) method [18,32], as shown in Figure 2. An undisturbed soil core sample was collected at 10-15 cm depth for the SWRC development, and the van Genuchten [33] equation was used to describe the relationship between the volumetric water contents and the soil matric potentials.…”
Section: Soil and Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The field bulk density of the soil during the soil collection was 1.25 g/cm 3 , and it was determined by the soil core method [31]. A soil water release curve (SWRC) was constructed using the combined datasets from the HYPROP ® evaporation method (UMS GmbH, Munich, Germany) and the WP4 dewpoint potentiometer (Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA, USA) method [18,32], as shown in Figure 2. An undisturbed soil core sample was collected at 10-15 cm depth for the SWRC development, and the van Genuchten [33] equation was used to describe the relationship between the volumetric water contents and the soil matric potentials.…”
Section: Soil and Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SWRC was used to determine the soil hydraulic property parameters listed in Table 1. A second SWRC was developed after completing all infiltration experiments by the combined datasets from the HYPROP ® evaporation and WP4 dewpoint potentiometer methods following the same procedure described earlier in this section and in Roy et al [18]. Though the same soil was used for the second SWRC, the soil properties were probably changed because the soil went through multiple freeze and thaw cycles and packing.…”
Section: Soil and Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Layer Solone et al, 2012;Roy et al, 2018). The main causes of PPA errors reported in these studies are related to a poor soil-plate contact caused by drying, as well as to a low unsaturated hydraulic conductivity.…”
Section: Sitementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Saturated water content was calculated from the soil bulk density assuming a particle density of 2.65 g cm −3 for mineral soil. Soil water content (SWC) at field capacity (FC) was obtained from Goos and Fairlie (1988), and SWC at permanent wilting point (PWP) was measured using the WP4 Dewpoint Potentiometer (Roy et al, 2018). The average water content over the two depths (15 and 30 cm) for saturation point, FC, and PWP was 0.59, 0.454, and 0.22 cm 3 cm −3 , respectively.…”
Section: Study Area and Climatementioning
confidence: 99%