2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-02032-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of a novel simulation model for transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Construct validity was not assessed in this study. Ivakhov et al describe a box trainer for the simulation of TAPP repair [17]. This composed of a synthetic box structure with a flap or porcine stomach prepared to simulate the abdominal wall.…”
Section: Totally Extra-peritoneal (Tep) Inguinal Hernia Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construct validity was not assessed in this study. Ivakhov et al describe a box trainer for the simulation of TAPP repair [17]. This composed of a synthetic box structure with a flap or porcine stomach prepared to simulate the abdominal wall.…”
Section: Totally Extra-peritoneal (Tep) Inguinal Hernia Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Animalbased tissue blocks and synthetic/artificial models are evolving rapidly and may represent less expensive and efficient simulation modalities. 8,9 Few simulators are currently available for training in foregut and/or bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to review the current status and future directions of simulation in foregut and bariatric surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the proven advantages of minimally invasive approaches, the widespread acceptance of LIHR has not yet been noted. 10 Recent studies have shown that the range of utilisation ranges from 10% to 48%, with nearly half of surgeons having never performed LIHR. 10 This is likely a result of the well-recognised steep learning curve associated with TEP and TAPP approaches, as well as the potential for rare but serious complications such as major vascular or visceral injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Recent studies have shown that the range of utilisation ranges from 10% to 48%, with nearly half of surgeons having never performed LIHR. 10 This is likely a result of the well-recognised steep learning curve associated with TEP and TAPP approaches, as well as the potential for rare but serious complications such as major vascular or visceral injury. 8,11 It is unsurprising that experienced surgeons will frequently default to an open approach, and those performing LIHR will be hesitant to offer opportunities to residents to learn these techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation