2020
DOI: 10.1111/trf.16049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of a Novel RT‐PCR system for reliable and rapid SARS‐CoV‐2 screening of blood donations

Abstract: Background The ongoing outbreak of SARS‐CoV‐2 has caused great global concerns. In contrast to SARS, some SARS‐CoV‐2 infected people can be asymptomatic or only have mild non‐specific symptoms. Furthermore, there is evidence that SARS‐CoV‐2 may be infectious during an asymptomatic incubation period. With the discovery that SARS‐CoV‐2 can be detected in plasma or serum, blood safety is worthy of consideration. Study design and Methods We developed a NAT screening system … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher frequency of SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA detection in the study of the Wuhan Blood Center could be related to differences in the sensitivity of pooled‐sample testing and in the time period of donation testing, which was performed closer to height of the outbreak of SARS‐CoV‐2 in Wuhan compared to the multicenter study in Hubei province 13 . However, another study in over 16 000 blood donors during the outbreak in Chengdu did not detect SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA in blood by testing in minipools of six samples (LOD for the N region, 12.5 copies/mL for single‐ and 75 copies/mL for pooled‐sample testing) 14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The higher frequency of SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA detection in the study of the Wuhan Blood Center could be related to differences in the sensitivity of pooled‐sample testing and in the time period of donation testing, which was performed closer to height of the outbreak of SARS‐CoV‐2 in Wuhan compared to the multicenter study in Hubei province 13 . However, another study in over 16 000 blood donors during the outbreak in Chengdu did not detect SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA in blood by testing in minipools of six samples (LOD for the N region, 12.5 copies/mL for single‐ and 75 copies/mL for pooled‐sample testing) 14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The results from the FRNT assay confirmed the RT-PCR assay. The novel N-IgY-pAb “intranasal spray” at 3 μg/mL (2x dilution, Figures 4A, B ) responded against the wild type of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the variants of Delta and Omicron, corresponding to the neutralizing rate of ≥ 95% ( 22 ). It implied that the “intranasal spray” containing 6μg/ml of N-IgY-pAb could be adequate to neutralize the virus effectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were plotted after background subtraction and normalized to the controls. The virus-neutralizing effect was accepted when the neutralizing rate was ≥ 95% ( 22 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Screening tests have some limitations and are not fully met at the donor or blood donation level. More recently, a novel RT-PCR system targeting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (N) and open reading frame 1ab (ORF 1ab) has been reported to be developed for confirmatory and quick screening of SARS-CoV-2 in blood donor specimens [31,32]. Optimum safety checkpoints need to be followed to ensure that the transfused blood is not contaminated with SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Strategies To Promote Blood Donationsmentioning
confidence: 99%