2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ics.2004.02.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of live influenza (LIV) cold-adapted reassortant vaccines in cell culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-infection step plays a key role in the classical genetic reassortment. Multiple studies have attempted to evaluate reassortment efficiencies of wild-type and cold-adapted viruses using different variants of crossing procedures, such as simultaneous [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] or successive [27][28][29] inoculation of two parental viruses. Co-infection procedures also differed by infectivity ratio of the viruses, temperature of incubation and culturing substrate (eggs or cell culture).…”
Section: Co-infection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Co-infection step plays a key role in the classical genetic reassortment. Multiple studies have attempted to evaluate reassortment efficiencies of wild-type and cold-adapted viruses using different variants of crossing procedures, such as simultaneous [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] or successive [27][28][29] inoculation of two parental viruses. Co-infection procedures also differed by infectivity ratio of the viruses, temperature of incubation and culturing substrate (eggs or cell culture).…”
Section: Co-infection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-infection procedures also differed by infectivity ratio of the viruses, temperature of incubation and culturing substrate (eggs or cell culture). Most of the recent studies describe reassortment of live parental viruses [11][12][13][14][15]20,[22][23][24][25][26]. However, the reassortment efficiency can be substantially improved if one of the parental viruses is inactivated prior to co-infection.…”
Section: Co-infection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%