2010
DOI: 10.3390/rs2112442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Evaluation of Phenological Change Indices Derived from Time Series of Image Data

Abstract: Changes in vegetation phenology are recognized as being possibly the most important early indicator of the impact of climate change on ecosystems. Time series of image data are accepted as being the best way to map these changes, if we can derive suitable indices from the huge volumes of time series data that make the interpretation of these time series difficult. The problem is thus to derive a set of indices from the time series of image data that depict changes in vegetation phenology in a way that is easy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A critical aspect for the true identification of crop marks is the phenological stage of the crops [16,17]. Diverse parameters, such as the weather conditions, the date of onset of greenness, the soil and crop characteristics, and the changes in the climate of an area (e.g., the length of the growing season), may cause variations in the phenological cycle of crops [18]. The latter can also affect researchers' interpretation, since features/crop marks detected from a satellite image taken during a specific phenological stage (e.g., boot stage), might be difficult to differentiate from a succeeding one taken during a different phenological stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical aspect for the true identification of crop marks is the phenological stage of the crops [16,17]. Diverse parameters, such as the weather conditions, the date of onset of greenness, the soil and crop characteristics, and the changes in the climate of an area (e.g., the length of the growing season), may cause variations in the phenological cycle of crops [18]. The latter can also affect researchers' interpretation, since features/crop marks detected from a satellite image taken during a specific phenological stage (e.g., boot stage), might be difficult to differentiate from a succeeding one taken during a different phenological stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially the de-convolution of the original time series into phenological and productivity metrics yield additional information on various aspects of vegetation dynamics and ecosystem functioning [18] that can be related to land use [19]. Monitoring vegetation phenology using satellite remote sensing [20][21][22][23][24][25] offers an optimal framework for ecosystem studies because in situ phenological data are comparatively scarce in many parts of the world [26] and because long time and large spatial scales can be addressed simultaneously. Monitoring vegetation phenology has also improved the understanding of the interactions between the biosphere, the climate and biogeochemical cycles [16,[27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This development and the validation of the indices are given in McCloy (2010). It has been shown in McCloy (2010) that most of the indices measure closely but not perfectly the five ways that the phenological profile as described above can change. The exception to this is the Offset Index that is a precise measure of the average change in the Phenological Profile.…”
Section: A Change In the Amplitude Of The Growing Season (Gain Index)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such validation was reported in McCloy (2010) in which sample profiles were derived for selected land covers, and then modified in three specific ways using specific formulae to do so; to change the relative amplitude, the absolute value and the length of the season. How the Phenological Change Indices changed in response to these rigorous changes to the phenological profiles is given in McCloy (2010) and can be summarized as:…”
Section: Validation Of the Phenological Change Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%