IntroductionThis theme issue on the``Ordinary spaces of modernity'' arose from a conference event that sought to bring together scholars interested in how the contingencies and ambivalences of urban space mattered for how different actors engaged in`improving' or developing others'. Our rationale for this event was motivated in part by a double notion of parochialism. On the one hand, we sought to emphasise the importance of the parochial, of the tensions and ambivalences of municipal officials, and of the role of everyday materialities of construction or infrastructure, for the nature and contestation of improvement and development. On the other hand, we sought to do this by disrupting what has come to be criticised as a certain parochialism in urban studies, and in particular the tendency to make generalisations of`non-Western' urban forms, or to conceptually separate the`Western city' from the`Third World city ' (cf Bishop et al, 2003;King, 2004;McFarlane, 2006a;Robinson, 2006). We sought papers that illustrated the importance of connections and comparisons temporally, between colonialism and development, and spatially, between`Western' and`Southern' urbanism. We hope that, in tracing a range of contextual tensions and translations, the collection charts a diversity of temporal and spatial continuities and discontinuities. Legg, Perera, and Harris focus on colonial contexts in India, Sri Lanka, and a variety of African contexts, and Gandy, McFarlane, and Robinson are concerned with contemporary urban spaces in India and South Africa.At a general level, the collection illustrates the possibilities of comparative urban research. In particular, it demonstrates how attentiveness to the connections between ordinary urban spaces across time and space demands that postcolonial and development scholarshipöso often divergent in their objects and forms of analysis (Power et al, 2006;Simon, 2006;Sylvester, 1999)öbe brought into dialogue (Briggs and Sharp, 2004;Legg, 2006;McFarlane, 2006b). Such a dialogue helps make sense, for example, of how the historical and contemporary relationalities of urban space, the mixing of thè here' and`there', inform the practices of urban government on issues as diverse as planning, housing and infrastructural provision, congestion, and the production of city development strategies. In this sense, we wish to locate the ordinary urban spaces featured in this issue between development and postcolonialism. In order to explore the collective contribution of this issue for thinking comparatively across urban space, this introduction is framed around two broad central themes that are engaged in the theme issue. These themes consider the issue's contribution to debates at the intersection between urban studies, development, and postcolonialism around, first, the relations between modernity, development, and the city, and second, on spatial and temporal (dis)continuity.
Modernity, development, and the cityIn demonstrating a variety of ways in which urban space becomes a key site for the producti...