2010
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and optimization of a process for automated recovery of single cells identified by microengraving

Abstract: Microfabricated devices are useful tools for manipulating and interrogating large numbers of single cells in a rapid and cost-effective manner, but connecting these systems to the existing platforms used in routine high-throughput screening of libraries of cells remains challenging. Methods to sort individual cells of interest from custom microscale devices to standardized culture dishes in an efficient and automated manner without affecting the viability of the cells are critical. Combining a commercially ava… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because microengraving is a nondestructive process, and cells have known spatial addresses within the array of wells used, we expected that microengraving would allow the efficient recovery of activated antigen-specific cells by micromanipulation for clonal expansion (Fig. S5) (14,28).…”
Section: Rapid and Efficient Cloning Of Hiv-specific Cd8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because microengraving is a nondestructive process, and cells have known spatial addresses within the array of wells used, we expected that microengraving would allow the efficient recovery of activated antigen-specific cells by micromanipulation for clonal expansion (Fig. S5) (14,28).…”
Section: Rapid and Efficient Cloning Of Hiv-specific Cd8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell recovery from closedformat microfluidic devices (such as those developed here), however, often requires more sophisticated cell manipulation strategies--generally at the expense of device footprint area--to route cells to the outlet [for example, via multiplexer architectures (29,30), electrical manipulation (31), or optical sorting techniques (32,33)]. Here, as our microfluidic devices share essential features with open-format devices, in particular portable device operation and registration of cells at spatially defined positions, we were able to adapt a semiautomated micromanipulator-based cell recovery approach previously established for microwell arrays (34). For this purpose, we introduced a design variation that involved bonding the polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) devices to a thin (∼10-20-μm) PDMS sheet (membrane) instead of glass slides ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were retrieved from their traps using an semiautomated micromanipulator (CellCelector, AVISO GmbH) by piercing the membrane and applying suction following an adaptation of the operation procedures described before (34). Glass capillaries were pulled and broken back manually to induce an angled opening at the tip to facilitate easy membrane piercing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also straightforward to recover specific cells by micromanipulation to rescue particular genes or generate clonal lines of interest. [102][103][104] The integration of microfluidic systems with these types of arrays can further expand their utility by enabling the modulation of microenvironments or application of stimuli. 105,106 Similar to most examples of microfluidic assays, one of the main disadvantages in these systems is the efficiency of distributing stem cells into individual wells.…”
Section: Microwell-based Analysis Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70 This dimension of time is common for monitoring cellular behaviors such as motility, morphology, and growth by microscopy, but is less commonly applied to the evolution of functions such as secretion. 104 The other implication of knowing the location of individual stem cells throughout an analytical process is that it should be possible to design strategies that conserve the available sample.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%