2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10826-018-1080-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of Family Minds: A Mentalization-based Psychoeducation Program for Foster Parents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
79
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
7
79
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Parents’ general mind-mindedness did not significantly change after the training, indicating that the intervention did not directly affect their ability to mentalize about their foster child. This is in line with Adkins et al ( 2018 ), who evaluated a short foster parents’ training in reflective functioning. Although they found enhanced reflective functioning in the foster parents, only some were able to comprehend the mental states that underlie behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parents’ general mind-mindedness did not significantly change after the training, indicating that the intervention did not directly affect their ability to mentalize about their foster child. This is in line with Adkins et al ( 2018 ), who evaluated a short foster parents’ training in reflective functioning. Although they found enhanced reflective functioning in the foster parents, only some were able to comprehend the mental states that underlie behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This study investigated whether a less intensive intervention, such as a training curriculum for foster parents, also can enhance parental sensitivity and the ability to mentalize. Some preliminary evidence for this has already been found in a study by Adkins, Luyten, and Fonagy ( 2018 ).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Training For Foster Parents ‘Caring For Chmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…A significant difference was found between the groups in term of post-RF scores, with the intervention group demonstrating significantly increased levels of RF. The positive results were supported further by Adkins et al (2018). At treatment end, there were large effect sizes found for RF as measured by the PRFQ ( d = .74) and the FMSS ( d = 1.31) for those randomised to the Family Mind programme compared to those in the control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Enav et al, (2019) also used the PDI for parents of children with autism. Bammens et al (2015) and Adkins et al (2018) assessed parental RF using the five minute speech sample (FMSS; Magaña-Amato, 1983) coded for RF using the RF scale (Fonagy et al, 1998) in their respective analysis of the Family Minds programme for foster and adoptive parents. Midgley et al (2019a) used the FMSS for foster parents but it was not reported as an outcome measure in the study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FMSS will be recorded for each caregiver at the beginning of the study and prior to each session. The FMSS has been used for over 30 years to assess the emotional expressiveness of parents towards their children [39], but over recent years its has increasingly been used as a tool for assessing parents’ or caregivers’ reflective functioning [40, 41]. RF levels are obtained by coding the transcription according to the Reflective functioning evaluation manual with a scale that goes from − 1 (avoidance or rejection of mentalization) to 9 points (complete or exceptional RF).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%