Development and psychometric testing of a scale assessing the sharing of medical information and interprofessional communication: the CSI scale

Abstract

BackgroundInterprofessional collaboration is essential in creating a safer patient environment. It includes the need to develop communication and coordination between professionals, implying a better sharing of medical information. Several questionnaires exist in the literature, but none of them have been developed in the French context. The objective was to develop and test the psychometric properties of the communication and sharing information (CSI) scale which assesses specifically interprofessional communication, especially the sharing of medical information and the effectiveness of communication between members of the team.MethodsThe questionnaire construction process used a literature review and involved a panel of voluntary professionals. A list of 32 items explored the quality of shared information delivered to patients and the effectiveness of interprofessional communication. The study was conducted in 16 voluntary units in a University Hospital (France), which included medical, surgical, obstetrics, intensive care, pediatrics, oncology and rehabilitation care. The scale-development process comprised an exploratory principal component analysis, Cronbach’s α-coefficients and structural equation modeling (SEM).ResultsFrom these 16 units, a total of 503 health professionals took part in the study. Among them, 23.9% were physicians (n = 120), 43.9% nurses (n = 221) and 32.2% nurse assistants (n = 162).The validated questionnaire comprised 13 items and 3 dimensions relative to “the sharing of medical information” (5 items), “communication between physicians” (4 items) and “communication between nurses and nurse assistants” (4 items). The 3 dimensions accounted for 63.7% of the variance of the final questionnaire. Their respective Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were 0.80, 0.87 and 0.81. SEM confirmed the existence of the 3 latent dimensions but the best characteristics were obtained with a hierarchical model including the three latent factors and a global “communication between healthcare professionals” latent factor, bringing the 8 items linked to communication together. All the structural coefficients were highly significant (P < 0.001).ConclusionsThis self-perception CSI scale assessing several facets of interprofessional communication is the first one developed in the French context. The development study exhibited excellent psychometric properties. Further psychometric analysis is needed to establish test-retest reliability, sensibility to change and concurrent validity.

Collaboration of midwives in primary care midwifery practices with other maternity care providers

“…We could argue there lies a possible relation in the average duration of maternity care assistance and the midwives' satisfaction with collaboration with MCA(O)s on the level of urbanisation in our study. Our study did not find predicted associations of satisfaction with collaboration with attitudes towards work, such as job satisfaction, turnover intentions or retention (Baggs and Ryan, 1990;Chang et al, 2009;Anthoine et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2016). Instead, we found differences on work-related and personal characteristics with some care providers, on the level of urbanisation, region, age, working years, non-Dutch origin and problems of accessibility in the interaction.…”

“…Dutch maternity care provides a unique research arena. International research shows important associations of satisfaction with collaboration and: a) work-related and personal characteristics, such as gender, race, advanced education and profession (Bruner et al, 2011) and b) attitudes towards work, such as job satisfaction (Baggs and Ryan, 1990;Chang et al, 2009;Anthoine et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2016) and turnover intentions (Anthoine et al, 2014) or retention (Baggs and Ryan, 1990;Zhang et al, 2016). Yet, prior quantitative studies on associations with 'satisfaction with collaboration' have often focused on the physician-nurse collaboration in hospitals.…”

Development and Validation of a Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Questionnaire on COVID-19 (KAP COVID-19)

“…The inclusion criteria for both the pilot and main studies were that participants were at least 18 years of age, were enrolled in an undergraduate nursing program and were full-time students during the academic year of 2020 after the COVID-19 pandemic breakout. Although there is no gold standard, the recommended sample size to validate a newly developed instrument is a minimum of five individuals per item [ 23 , 24 ]. Therefore, at least 170 participants were required for the 34-item KAP COVID-19.…”

Nursing assistants matters—An ethnographic study of knowledge sharing in interprofessional practice

“…Research has also shown that there are differences in the way the individual professionals construe, use, and communicate professional knowledge (Fenwick & Nerland, ), which can be a challenge for interprofessional collaboration. The reasons for these diversities can be different work responsibilities, social status or culture, and different competencies (Anthoine, Delmas, Coutherut, & Moret, ). In a literature review about the role of nursing assistants, Munn, Tufanaru, and Aromataris () summarize that there is an ambiguity regarding the roles and tasks that they fill in current health care system, especially in relation to the role and tasks of registered nurses.…”