1990
DOI: 10.2172/6467911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and test case application of a waste minimization project evaluation method

Abstract: The authors have developed and applied a methodology to ewiluate and prioritize proposed waste minimization activities affecting Department of Energy (DOE) programs. This approach provides a systematic and defensible method for selecting a set ot" waste minimization proposals that maximizes the benefits to DOE while maintaining costs within a specified budget. The report discusses the development of a structured set of evaluation criteria to characterize waste minimization issues; techniques for documenting th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sub-criteria nodes may Sandia National Laboratories has give rise to sub-sub-criteria nodes, etc. just finished a Test Case [2] for the DOE Finally, ali of the alternatives (projects) "…”
Section: Tntrqduclionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sub-criteria nodes may Sandia National Laboratories has give rise to sub-sub-criteria nodes, etc. just finished a Test Case [2] for the DOE Finally, ali of the alternatives (projects) "…”
Section: Tntrqduclionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having developed the relevant DOE sites. In [2] Kjeldgaard, Saloio and criteria, the use of AHP next undertakes Varnado proposed the use of the to derive t)riorities for each of the Analytic Hierarchy Process [4] to alternativeff being compared. Priorities develop criteria against which are positive real numbers which reflect alternative projects can be compared as the relative values of the alternatives to relative benefits.…”
Section: Tntrqduclionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation