Development and Testing of a Multidimensional iPhone Pain Assessment Application for Adolescents with Cancer

Abstract

BackgroundPain is one of the most common and distressing symptoms reported by adolescents with cancer. Despite advancements in pain assessment and management research, pain due to cancer and/or its treatments continues to be poorly managed. Our research group has developed a native iPhone application (app) called Pain Squad to tackle the problem of poorly managed pain in the adolescent with cancer group. The app functions as an electronic pain diary and is unique in its ability to collect data on pain intensity, duration, location, and the impact pain has on an adolescent’s life (ie, relationships, school work, sleep, mood). It also evaluates medications and other physical and psychological pain management strategies used. Users are prompted twice daily at configurable times to complete 20 questions characterizing their pain and the app transmits results to a database for aggregate reporting through a Web interface. Each diary entry represents a pain case filed by an adolescent with cancer and a reward system (ie, moving up through law-enforcement team ranks, built-in videotaped acknowledgements from fictitious officers) encourages consistent use of the diary.ObjectiveOur objective was to design, develop, and test the usability, feasibility, compliance, and satisfaction of a game-based smartphone pain assessment tool for adolescents with cancer.MethodsWe used both low- and high-fidelity qualitative usability testing with qualitative semi-structured, audio-taped interviews and iterative cycles to design and refine the iPhone based Pain Squad app. Qualitative thematic analysis of interviews using constant comparative methodology captured emergent themes related to app usability. Content validity was assessed using question importance-rating surveys completed by participants. Compliance and satisfaction data were collected following a 2-week feasibility trial where users were alarmed to record their pain twice daily on the app.ResultsThematic analysis of usability interviews showed the app to be appealing overall to adolescents. Analyses of both low- and high-fidelity testing resulted in minor revisions to the app to refine the theme and improve its usability. Adolescents resoundingly endorsed the game-based nature of the app and its virtual reward system. The importance of app pain diary questions was established by content validity analysis. Compliance with the app, assessed during feasibility testing, was high (mean 81%, SD 22%) and adolescents from this phase of the study found the app likeable, easy to use, and not bothersome to complete.ConclusionsA multifaceted usability approach demonstrated how the Pain Squad app could be made more appealing to children and adolescents with cancer. The game-based nature and built-in reward system of the app was appealing to adolescents and may have resulted in the high compliance rates and satisfaction ratings observed during clinical feasibility testing.

Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy in the treatment of psychiatric illness

“…[16][17][18]24,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] In Box 3, we have highlighted several programs. An additional program, OCFighter, is described in detail in Box 4.…”

Oncologic pain relief: strategies told by adolescents with cancer

“…4 An analysis of the Brazilian scientific production about pediatric cancer, published between 2000 and 2009, indicated the need for further research on the experience of adolescents with cancer, 7 which is significantly permeated by painful experiences. 8 Adolescence is a period of intense physical, psychological and social development, during which the adolescents gain further responsibility and autonomy, becoming increasingly dependent on the caregivers. 9 It is considered that, due to this greater independence, the adolescents themselves are the best source of information about their painful experience related to the cancer and its treatment, as well as effective strategies to relieve their pain, contributing to the excellence of cancer pain management.…”

Use of Mobile Devices to Help Cancer Patients Meet Their Information Needs in Non-Inpatient Settings: Systematic Review (Preprint)

“…Almost all patients reported that they found the mobile interventions easy to use, regardless of age, cancer type and experience with technology [28,35,36,38,39,40,43,[45][46][47]. For example, Head and colleagues [35] reported that all 44 patients from the intervention arm of an RCT reported a handheld device to be very easy (85%) or easy (15%) to use.…”

“…Studies generally reported high adherence rates to the mobile interventions, regardless of the length of the study [28,30,31,35,43,44,45,[47][48][49]. A pilot RCT of 44 patients reported that patients used a handheld device consistently for an average of 10 weeks [35].…”