2006
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2006.3.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a PulseNet Standardized Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Protocol for Subtyping ofVibrio cholerae

Abstract: PulseNet is a network that utilizes standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) protocols with the purpose of conducting laboratory-based surveillance of foodborne pathogens. PulseNet standardized PFGE protocols are subject to rigorous testing during the developmental phase and careful evaluation during a validation process assessing its robustness and reproducibility in different laboratories. Here we describe the development and validation of a rapid PFGE protocol for subtyping Vibrio cholerae for u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Isolates were analysed using a PulseNet standardized PFGE protocol for V. cholerae (Cooper et al, 2006) with NotI restriction enzymes (NEB). PFGE was performed using a Clamped Homogeneous Electric Fields (CHEF) Mapper (Bio-Rad).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolates were analysed using a PulseNet standardized PFGE protocol for V. cholerae (Cooper et al, 2006) with NotI restriction enzymes (NEB). PFGE was performed using a Clamped Homogeneous Electric Fields (CHEF) Mapper (Bio-Rad).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the PulseNet 1-day standardized PFGE protocol for V. cholerae (24). Cell suspensions were placed in polystyrene tubes (Falcon; 12 by 75 mm), and their optical density was adjusted to 3.8 to 4.2 using a Densimat photometer (bioMérieux, France).…”
Section: Bacterial Isolates and Serological Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time consumed by the original procedure for GAS DNA preparation was up to two to three days [17]. In recent years, optimized PFGE protocols for bacterial subtyping have reduced the bacterial DNA preparation time to 2-4 hours, but they still involve the use of solutions that contain cell-wall-disrupting enzymes and proteases or huge amounts of restriction enzymes, and some of them do not generate reproducible results of good quality, probably due to inefficient bacterial lysis [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. As well, the separation of DNA macrorestriction fragments takes between 18 and 24 hours in the CHEF chamber [18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, optimized PFGE protocols for bacterial subtyping have reduced the bacterial DNA preparation time to 2-4 hours, but they still involve the use of solutions that contain cell-wall-disrupting enzymes and proteases or huge amounts of restriction enzymes, and some of them do not generate reproducible results of good quality, probably due to inefficient bacterial lysis [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. As well, the separation of DNA macrorestriction fragments takes between 18 and 24 hours in the CHEF chamber [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Procedures for GAS subtyping have been reported based on these optimized protocols, but in general, they have the same mentioned drawbacks in relation to the DNA preparation and the long electrophoresis times [25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%