2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2015.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of a Scalable Next-Generation Sequencing System for Assessing Relevant Somatic Variants in Solid Tumors

Abstract: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has enabled genome-wide personalized oncology efforts at centers and companies with the specialty expertise and infrastructure required to identify and prioritize actionable variants. Such approaches are not scalable, preventing widespread adoption. Likewise, most targeted NGS approaches fail to assess key relevant genomic alteration classes. To address these challenges, we predefined the catalog of relevant solid tumor somatic genome variants (gain-of-function or loss-of-funct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
247
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
8
247
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Oncomine Cancer Panel assay 10 using AmpliSeq chemistry and the PGM sequencer was selected and optimized for the NCI-MATCH NGS assay. The NCI-MATCH NGS assay system was designed to detect and report 4066 predefined genomic variations, encompassing 3259 SNVs, 114 indels, 435 large indels, 75 CNVs, and 183 gene fusions (Supplemental Table S2) across 143 unique genes (after removal of genes duplicated in more than one variant type) (Supplemental Table S3) in the Oncomine Cancer Research Panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific).…”
Section: Assay System and Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Oncomine Cancer Panel assay 10 using AmpliSeq chemistry and the PGM sequencer was selected and optimized for the NCI-MATCH NGS assay. The NCI-MATCH NGS assay system was designed to detect and report 4066 predefined genomic variations, encompassing 3259 SNVs, 114 indels, 435 large indels, 75 CNVs, and 183 gene fusions (Supplemental Table S2) across 143 unique genes (after removal of genes duplicated in more than one variant type) (Supplemental Table S3) in the Oncomine Cancer Research Panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific).…”
Section: Assay System and Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicopathologic data was obtained from medical records. DNA isolation was performed as described (11).…”
Section: Tissue Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NGS-based platforms for cancer genomic testing, such as FoundationOne and the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay, have been applied as investigational clinical sequencing methods in the field of clinical oncology [6,7]. FoundationOne and the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay cover 315 and 161 cancer-related genes, respectively.…”
Section: Genomic Tests For Personalized Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…FGFR inhibitors are classified into FGFR1/2/3 inhibitors, FGFR4 inhibitors, and pan-FGFR inhibitors as a result of the divergence of FGFR4 from other FGFRs [7]. AZD4547, derazantinib, and infigratinib are representative FGFR1/2/3 inhibitors in clinical trials, whereas erdafitinib and LY2874455 are representative pan-FGFR inhibitors in clinical trials.…”
Section: Functional Proteomics For Personalized Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%