2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a new soot formation model for gas turbine combustor simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In non-premixed flames, once the soot particle is incepted, it experiences the processes of aggregation, surface growth and later -oxidation. Soot particles are aggregates [9] of primary spherules and a fundamental model has to take this into account. One approach is to use the sectional method [10,11], in which the primary particles are divided into sections according to their mass [12][13][14], and aggregates are divided in a similar way according to a number of primary particles per aggregate [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In non-premixed flames, once the soot particle is incepted, it experiences the processes of aggregation, surface growth and later -oxidation. Soot particles are aggregates [9] of primary spherules and a fundamental model has to take this into account. One approach is to use the sectional method [10,11], in which the primary particles are divided into sections according to their mass [12][13][14], and aggregates are divided in a similar way according to a number of primary particles per aggregate [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coagulation, ω coag , does not influence the soot mass fraction but reduces n s since small soot particles recombine to larger particles. A detailed derivation of the two-equation soot model is given by Di Domenico et al 25 and by Blacha et al 26 Since only two transport equations instead of 25 have to be solved, the two-equation soot model is more efficient than the sectional approach. However, the two-equation soot model assumes monodisperse soot particles and is not capable of resolving soot particle size distributions and thus provides a less detailed insight into the soot formation process.…”
Section: Iic Soot Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33] This model has more recently found application in the CFD field. 28,29,[34][35][36] Computationally less expensive than very detailed soot modeling, 37,38 the sectional approach provides a good accuracy. Di Domenico 34 used for the first time the sectional approach for the CFD simulation of soot formation in gas turbine combustors.…”
Section: Char Description With Discrete Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%