2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2003.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a patient questionnaire to determine New York heart association classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
70
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…MLHF score was highly related to NYHA at follow-up (Fig. 2), as expected [3]. There were 135 patients (66%) who had a score higher than 30.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…MLHF score was highly related to NYHA at follow-up (Fig. 2), as expected [3]. There were 135 patients (66%) who had a score higher than 30.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…NYHA functional class was rated by a single cardiologist using information from a structured interview [20]; higher classes indicate worse functional status. Last known left ventricular ejection fraction was abstracted from the medical record.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study reported that the median estimation made by patients for a 50-metre distance was 73 metres (range 9 to 274 metres)-an overestimation of 46%. Attempts to improve the accuracy in NYHA class assignment have been made by developing adjunct questionnaires aimed at increasing precision [2] [20].…”
Section: Validity and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Raphael et al's [2] survey of 50 cardiologists, 67% reported using a patient's ability to walk up a flight of stairs as the discriminatory question to determine a classification of II or III. The adjunct questionnaires developed by Goldman et al [13] and Kubo et al [20], aimed at increasing the accuracy of NYHA class assignment, were shown to be valid when used by physicians and non-physicians. The continued application of these adjunct questionnaires in research is not known.…”
Section: Validity and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%