Objective To report the early and mid-term results of patients who underwent minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MI-AVR) with a sutureless prosthesis from an international prospective registry. Methods Between March 2011 and September 2018, among 957 patients included in the prospective observational SURE-AVR (Sorin Universal REgistry on Aortic Valve Replacement) registry, 480 patients underwent MI-AVR with self-expandable Perceval aortic bioprosthesis (LivaNova PLC, London, UK) in 29 international institutions through either minithoracotomy ( n = 266) or ministernotomy ( n = 214). Postoperative, follow-up, and echocardiographic outcomes were analyzed for all patients. Results Patient age was 76.1 ± 7.1 years; 64.4% were female. Median EuroSCORE I was 7.9% (interquartile range [IQR], 4.8 to 10.9). Median cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 81 minutes (IQR 64 to 100) and 51 minutes (IQR 40 to 63). First successful implantation was achieved in 97.9% of cases. Two in-hospital deaths occurred, 1 for noncardiovascular causes and 1 following a disabling stroke. In the early (≤30 days) period, stroke rate was 1.4%. Three early explants were reported: 2 due to nonstructural valve dysfunction (NSVD) and 1 for malpositioning. One mild and 1 moderate paravalvular leak were reported. In 16 patients (3.3%) pacemaker implantation was needed. Mean follow-up was 2.4 years (maximum = 7 years). During follow-up 5 explants were reported, 3 due to endocarditis and 2 due to NSVD. Follow-up stroke rate was 2.5%. Three structural valve deteriorations not requiring reintervention were reported. Five-year survival was 91.45%. Conclusions In this large prospective international registry, MI-AVR with Perceval valve confirmed to be safe, reproducible, and effective in an intermediate-risk population, providing excellent clinical recovery both in early and mid-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVES Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has been performed increasingly for the past 2 decades; however, large comparative studies on short- and long-term outcomes have been lacking. This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing MIMVS versus median sternotomy (MST) based on real-world data, extracted from the Netherlands Heart Registration. METHODS Patients undergoing mitral valve surgery, with or without tricuspid valve, atrial septal closure and/or rhythm surgery between 2013 and 2018 were included. Primary outcomes were short-term morbidity and mortality and long-term survival. Propensity score matching analyses were performed. RESULTS In total, 2501 patients were included, 1776 were operated through MST and 725 using an MIMVS approach. After propensity matching, no significant differences in baseline characteristics persisted. There were no between-group differences in 30-day mortality (1.1% vs 0.7%, P = 0.58), 1-year mortality (2.6% vs 2.1%, P = 0.60) or perioperative stroke rate (1.1% vs 0.6%, P = 0.25) between MST and MIMVS, respectively. An increased rate of postoperative arrhythmia was observed in the MST group (31.3% vs 22.4%, P < 0.001). A higher repair rate was found in the MST group (80.9% vs 76.3%, P = 0.04). No difference in 5-year survival was found between the matched groups (95.0% vs 94.3%, P = 0.49). Freedom from mitral reintervention was 97.9% for MST and 96.8% in the MIMVS group (P = 0.01), without a difference in reintervention-free survival (P = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS The MIMVS approach is as safe as the sternotomy approach for the surgical treatment of mitral valve disease. However, it comes at a cost of a reduced repair rate and more reinterventions in the long term, in the real-world.

No abstract

Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Frequently, TVR is performed in critically ill patients with high frequency of re-intervention. We analyzed our experience in TVR focusing on predicting risk factors, mid-term survival and quality of life assessed with a Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. Between January 1992 and May 2007, 81 consecutive patients underwent TVR (54 re-interventions, 66.7%; 46 procedures, associated with a left-sided operation, 56.8%). There were 59 females (73%) with a mean age of 59.3+/-11.6 years. The most prevalent etiology was rheumatic fever (61.7%). Pulmonary hypertension was present in 64%. Mean left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was 56.6% and mean right ventricle ejection fraction (RVEF) was 48.1%. All but four patients (4.9%) received a bio-prosthesis. Hospital mortality was 9.88%. The mean follow-up was 61+/-42 months. Survival was 68% at five years. Univariate predictors of hospital mortality were atrial fibrillation (AFib) (P<0.01), associated procedures on the left heart (P=0.025) and preoperative chronic right heart failure symptoms (P<0.01). At follow-up: 10.8% of patients had a pace-maker (PM) induced rhythm; the mean SF-36 score was 51.1+/-4.8 (range 59-38). Age (P=0.015), associated procedures (P=0.024) and previous cardiovascular surgery (P=0.015) were univariate predictors of the SF-36 score. At a multivariate analysis LVEF, venous congestion and pulmonary artery pressures (PAPs) were related with a SF-36 score.

12 patients with mild to moderate impairment of renal function and 12 healthy subjects each received 20mg buspirone as a single dose in this acute study. Six anuric patients with chronic renal failure were given two 20mg doses of buspirone, the first 2 days before haemodialysis (between dialyses) and the second during hemodialysis (2 hours before dialysis began). The differences between the median pharmacokinetic values of buspirone for healthy subjects, patients with mild to moderate renal impairment, and anuric patients were not statistically significant. Similarly, there were no significant differences between values in mild to moderate renal failure vs healthy subjects. Some of the median pharmacokinetic values for the active buspirone metabolite 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (1-PP), however, differed significantly for anuric patients, compared with healthy subjects or patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. When assessed between and during haemodialysis, the anuric patients had significantly (p less than 0.05) greater pharmacokinetic median values: half-life (t 1/2) = 15.2 vs 9.8 hours; area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) = 604 vs 404 nmol/L.h; and mean residence time (MRT) = 9.28 vs 6.96 hours. No firm recommendation for specific dosage can be made based on the present data. However, it does appear that in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment, the pharmacokinetics of buspirone and its active metabolite 1-PP are similar to those in individuals with normal renal function. For anuric patients higher concentrations of the 1-PP metabolite are attained while they are not undergoing haemodialysis. A dosage reduction of 25 to 50% might be necessary when buspirone is given to anuric patients.