2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2013.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of an instrument to measure organizational cultures’ support of Business Process Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
209
1
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
209
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 reports that Cronbach's α and CR were above the cut off value of 0.7, hence indicating acceptable individual and internal reliabilities (Schmiedel et al, 2014). Table 2 also reports that AVE scores exceeded the 0.5 threshold, whereas the square root of AVE of each construct was greater than the correlations involved in the remaining constructs.…”
Section: /( /()( ! -mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Table 2 reports that Cronbach's α and CR were above the cut off value of 0.7, hence indicating acceptable individual and internal reliabilities (Schmiedel et al, 2014). Table 2 also reports that AVE scores exceeded the 0.5 threshold, whereas the square root of AVE of each construct was greater than the correlations involved in the remaining constructs.…”
Section: /( /()( ! -mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, we cannot make statements about organizational elements that may influence the repeated use of models or other objects, even though it is possible that certain organizational beliefs and values would influence intentions towards repeated use. One example of such a possible scenario is a culture dominated by beliefs of teamwork, responsibility, customer orientation and excellence -which has been shown to be conducive to business process management initiatives [71], including the (repeated) use of models. Still, the qualitative insights gained provide some empirical material for further theorizing and quantitative measurement.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bias of nonresponse was analyzed based on t-test for the firm's performance variables, considering initial (pilot study) and final (full study) observations, as was done before (Schmiedel, Vom Brocke, & Recker, 2014). No significant differences were observed for these variables.…”
Section: Measurement Model and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%