Development and validation of diabetes empowerment questionnaire in <scp>I</scp>ranian people with type 2 diabetes

Aghili, Rokhsareh; Khamseh, Mohammad E.; Malek, Mojtaba; Banikarimi, A.S.; Baradaran, Hamid Reza; Valojerdi, Ameneh Ebrahim

doi:10.1111/inr.12007

Cited by 26 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Seventeen definitions (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) (Chart 1) and seven dimensions (9,14,(24)(25)(26)(27)(28) of empowerment (Chart 2), and 10 empowerment measures (9,13,24,(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) (Chart 3) were selected. The analysis showed that the concept of empowerment has been broadly used in the health sciences field, especially over the last 10 years.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fotoukian et al, 2014 (14) Ouschan et al, 2000 (25) Salmon et al, 2004 (28) Gaining control Small et al, 2013 (9) Fotoukian et al, 2014 (14) Ouschan et al, 2000 (25) Aujoulat et al, 2008 (26) Oh et al, 2012 (27) Salmon et al, 2004 (28) Knowledge acquisition Aghili et al, 2013 (24) Ouschan et al, 2000 (25) Aujoulat et al, 2008 (26) Coping skills …”

Section: Definition and Dimensionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Trust Oh et al, 2012 (27) Self-care Fotoukian et al, 2014 (14) Aghili et al, 2013 (24) Sharing and capacity building Small et al, 2013 (9) Source: authors' own elaboration, Barcelona, Spain, 2015…”

Section: Definition and Dimensionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The context in which these tools were applied and the operationalized constructs are described in Chart 3. Four tools were developed in the United States (29,31,(33)(34) , four in Great Britain (9,30,32,35) , one in Australia (13) , and one in Iran (24) . All but one of the tools (31) are setting (primary health care (9,32) and hospital care (30) ) or condition-specific.…”

Section: Empowerment Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Concepts and measures of patient empowerment: a comprehensive review

Cerezo¹,

Juvé‐Udina

Delgado‐Hito

2016

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

121

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Analyze the definitions and dimensions of empowerment. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of empowerment measures based on the conceptual model. Method: This was a comprehensive literature review of publications on the MEDLINE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases. Results: Twenty-nine articles were selected. Seventeen definitions and seven dimensions of empowerment, and 10 empowerment measures were selected. Empowerment can be seen as an enabling process involving a shift in the balance of power, or as an outcome of this process. The dimensions reflect outcome indicators, such as participation in decisionmaking and control, and process indicators, such as knowledge acquisition and coping skills. Six of the tools analyzed by this study could be said to provide a robust measure of patient empowerment. Conclusion: we propose a definition of empowerment that helps to deepen understanding of the term and, therefore, its operationalization.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Definition and Dimensionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Definition and Dimensionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Empowerment Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Concepts and measures of patient empowerment: a comprehensive review

Cerezo¹,

Juvé‐Udina

Delgado‐Hito

2016

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

121

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…유방암 [8,23,27], 여성성 수용 [28], 자기통제 [6,8,22,27,28], 자기효능 [17,19,23,27], 자기결정 [8,17,23] 으로 하였고, 이는 유방암으로 인해 손상된 여성성을 긍정적으로 회 복하고 목적 달성을 위하여 자율적인 선택을 시행하며 자신의 삶을 조절하고자 하는 주도적인 역량을 의미한다. 상호작용적 요인의 개 념적 지표는 가족 대인관계 [5,10], 동료 대인관계 [7,10,23,27], 의료 인 대인관계 [7,9,18,20,21] Figure 2). …”

unclassified

Development and Validation of the Empowerment Scale for Woman with Breast Cancer

Shin

Park

2015

J Korean Acad Nurs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

연구의 필요성유방암은 유방암여성 임파워먼트 측정도구 개발 및 타당화Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a scale to evaluate empowerment in woman with breast cancer and to examine the validity and reliability of the scale. Methods: The development process for the initial items included a literature review, interviews, and construction of a conceptual framework. The identified items were evaluated for content validity by experts, resulting in 3 factors and 48 preliminary items. Participants were 319 women with breast cancer recruited to test reliability and validity of the preliminary scale. Data were analyzed using item analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, criterion related validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: The final scale consisted of 30 items and 3 factors. Factors, including 'intrapersonal factor' (14 items), 'interactional factor' (8 items), and 'behavioral factor' (8 items), were drawn up after confirmatory factor analysis. Goodness of fit of the final research model was very appropriate as shown by χ 2 /df=1.86, TLI=.90, CFI=.92, SRMR=.06, and RMSEA=.05. Criterion validity was evaluated by total correlation with the Cancer Empowerment Questionnaire .78. Cronbach's alpha for total items was .93 and test-retest reliability was .69. Conclusion: Findings from this study indicate that the scale can be used in the development of nursing interventions to promote the empowerment of women having breast cancer. If the original work is properly cited and retained without any modification or reproduction, it can be used and re-distributed in any format and medium.

show abstract

Effects of a partnership‐based, needs‐tailored self‐management support intervention for post‐treatment breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of partnErship-based, needs-tailored self-Management support Program fOr Women with breast cancER (EMPOWER), a partnership-based, needs-tailored, self-management (SM) support intervention designed to empower post-treatment breast cancer survivors (BCSs) and ultimately improve their health outcomes.Methods: This multi-center, two-armed, randomized controlled trial comprised 94 female BCSs who had completed primary cancer treatment in South Korea. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention group or the wait-list control group. The intervention group received a 7-week EMPOWER intervention via telephone counseling. The primary outcome was empowerment. Secondary outcomes included self-efficacy for post-treatment SM behaviors, mental adjustment, anxiety, depression, and health-related quality of life. Data were collected via a self-reported questionnaire at baseline (T0) and at 8 (T1) and 20 weeks (T2) of follow-up. Linear mixed models were used to assess group differences over time.Effective sizes were calculated using Cohen's d. Results:Retention rates were excellent (95.7% at T1; 94.7% at T2). Linear mixed model analyses revealed that the EMPOWER group showed significantly improved empowerment (mean difference 2.24, 95% CI = 0.18 to 4.29; p = 0.016) and general health perception (mean difference 3.68, 95% CI = 0.67 to 6.72; p = 0.037) compared with the control group. Time point analysis showed that several secondary outcomes significantly improved at T1, but the effects were not sustained. Conclusion: EMPOWER was effective in improving empowerment and general health perception among post-treatment BCS. Further studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of the EMPOWER intervention in other cancer populations.

show abstract

Development and validation of diabetes empowerment questionnaire in Iranian people with type 2 diabetes

Abstract: The Diabetes Empowerment Questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool to assess patient empowerment in Iranian people with type 2 diabetes.

Cited by 26 publications

References 27 publications

Concepts and measures of patient empowerment: a comprehensive review

Concepts and measures of patient empowerment: a comprehensive review

Development and Validation of the Empowerment Scale for Woman with Breast Cancer

Effects of a partnership‐based, needs‐tailored self‐management support intervention for post‐treatment breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About