2017
DOI: 10.4236/ojmp.2017.62012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of Supervision Scale in Phone Consultation in Iran

Abstract: The purpose of the present research is to develop and validate an instrument for supervision in phone consultation. Literature review and focus group discussion in the first stage led to the extraction of twenty items for the supervision scale. After the initial administration and the group work of the specialized team and upon receiving the feedback, the repetitive and overlapping items were deleted and ten important items were selected. Finally, the instrument was administered on 499 consolers of phone consu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, Dehghani et al (2017) developed and validated a Supervision Scale in phone consultation in Iran with two therapeutic alliance and intervention dimensions for this scale, we recommend that telephone counseling services use a Technical Effectiveness Scale to measure the counselor's performance after the call, including: (a) Can the caller be immediately re contacted? (b) Did the counselor ask for or obtain specific information regarding significant others?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, Dehghani et al (2017) developed and validated a Supervision Scale in phone consultation in Iran with two therapeutic alliance and intervention dimensions for this scale, we recommend that telephone counseling services use a Technical Effectiveness Scale to measure the counselor's performance after the call, including: (a) Can the caller be immediately re contacted? (b) Did the counselor ask for or obtain specific information regarding significant others?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%