2014
DOI: 10.1002/acr.22349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validation of the Lupus Impact Tracker: A Patient‐Completed Tool for Clinical Practice to Assess and Monitor the Impact of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Abstract: Objective. To derive and validate a brief patient-completed instrument, the Lupus Impact Tracker (LIT), to assess and monitor the impact of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods. Items for the LIT were selected from the LupusPRO, a validated patient-reported outcomes measure, using 3 approaches: confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), stepwise regression, and patient focus groups. CFA was conducted to find items from the LupusPRO that fit a unidimensional structure to allow scoring as a single index. Stepwis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
46
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Renal involvement in SLE was determined by whether renal ACR criteria28 were met in the diagnosis of SLE. Impact of SLE was assessed via the Lupus Impact Tracker (LIT)39 instrument, which has scores scaled to 0–100, with higher scores indicating greater impact of SLE. The presence of depressive symptoms was assessed via the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) depression severity screener 40.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renal involvement in SLE was determined by whether renal ACR criteria28 were met in the diagnosis of SLE. Impact of SLE was assessed via the Lupus Impact Tracker (LIT)39 instrument, which has scores scaled to 0–100, with higher scores indicating greater impact of SLE. The presence of depressive symptoms was assessed via the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) depression severity screener 40.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the development of the Lupus Impact Tracker (LIT) (Supplementary Table 1, available on the Arthritis & Rheumatology web site at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.39601/abstract) , a brief, easy to administer patient‐reported outcome instrument that measures the impact of SLE on patients’ well‐being did not exist. Physician‐completed instruments used to assess SLE disease activity or organ damage focus primarily on clinical and/or laboratory findings in SLE, which may not necessarily reflect the extent to which the disease impacts the patient's life, are time‐consuming, and require training to complete.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the item selection process for the LIT, psychometric methods, correspondence with clinical criteria, and qualitative studies involving patient feedback were used to select the 10 items from the LupusPRO that covered the concepts of cognition, lupus medications, physical health, pain/fatigue impact, emotional health, body image, and planning/desires/goals. The selected LIT items were evaluated in two different samples of patients and were shown to be reliable and valid . The purpose of the present study was to further investigate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness over time of the 10‐item LIT administered to SLE patients prospectively, in a clinical setting, without the context of the longer‐form LupusPRO, and to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of administering and completing the LIT from a patient and physician perspective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difficulty concentrating was assessed by the item “During the past 4 weeks, I experienced difficulty concentrating” (with possible responses of “none of the time,” “a little of the time,” “some of the time,” “most of the time,” and “all of the time”), from the Lupus Impact Tracker (LIT) (24). We dichotomized difficulty concentrating as all/most vs. some/little/none of the time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%