2010
DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.48.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Organizational Justice Scale

Abstract: Organizational justice has recently attracted attention as a predictor of employee mental and physical health. However, the lack of a Japanese translation of the original English-language organizational justice scale (OJS) has precluded its application in Japan. The present study aimed to develop Japanese version of the measure of organizational justice. We translated the original questionnaire, which is comprised of 20 items, from English to Japanese. The OJS is made up of four distinct dimensions: procedural… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
37
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies on the validation of OJM, the variety of the criterion variables were applied in numerous countriese.g., job satisfaction, anxiety, depression and effort-reward imbalance index in Japan [22], job satisfaction and work incivility in Spain [25], and job satisfaction, job stress, achieved in samples 1 and 2. The values of means and standard deviations for each type of organizational justice ranged from 3.05 and 0.70 for procedural justice, to 3.52 and 0.84 for interpersonal justice.…”
Section: Convergent Validitymentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In previous studies on the validation of OJM, the variety of the criterion variables were applied in numerous countriese.g., job satisfaction, anxiety, depression and effort-reward imbalance index in Japan [22], job satisfaction and work incivility in Spain [25], and job satisfaction, job stress, achieved in samples 1 and 2. The values of means and standard deviations for each type of organizational justice ranged from 3.05 and 0.70 for procedural justice, to 3.52 and 0.84 for interpersonal justice.…”
Section: Convergent Validitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In order to estimate overall justice, the aggregated measure of those four components may be used. The OJM has been used in many studies across a variety of industries and settings [21][22][23]. It has been translated and used in numerous countries, including the United States [3], Germany [21], Japan [22], Norway [23], Australia [24], and Spain [25].…”
Section: Study Population Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Organizational justice was measured using the Japanese version of the OJ questionnaire, which has been reported to have high internal reliability and validity 29) ; it is a translated version of the OJ questionnaire originally created and validated by Colquitt 8) . It includes 20 items and four dimensional scales: distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice.…”
Section: Organizational Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Cohen-Charash & Spector, 2001;Colquitt et al, 2001;Cropanzano, Bowen, & Gilliland, 2007;Greenberg, 1990;Lind & Tyler, 1988), postojanje valjanog i pouzdanog instrumenta za mjerenje organizacijske pravde, važno je i za zaposlene i za organizaciju. Skala organizacijske pravde (Organizational Justice Scale: Colquitt, 2001) pokazala je dobre psihometrijske karakteristike kako u originalnom istraživanju (Colquitt, 2001), tako i u validacionim studijama na njemačkom (Streicher et al, 2007) i japanskom uzorku (Shibaoka et al, 2010). Rezultati psihometrijske provjere i validacije skale na srpskom uzorku, mogli bi otvoriti prostor za njenu primjenu u našoj kulturi.…”
unclassified