2017
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.269712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a BNP1-32 Immunoassay That Does Not Cross-React with proBNP

Abstract: We have developed the first assay that measures BNP1-32 in plasma without interference by proBNP. Analysis of larger patient cohorts is now required to compare the performance of this assay with current less specific assays for the diagnosis or prognosis of HF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
20
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results reported by Lewis et al [53] confirmed that on average, the BNP 1-32 concentration in healthy subjects is very low (median under 1 ng/L). The setup of a new generation of commercial BNP immunoassay methods with a relevant increment in both analytical sensitivity and specificity is needed in order to detect these very low analyte concentrations.…”
Section: Hf Therapy With Arni: Is It the Time For The Renaissance Of mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results reported by Lewis et al [53] confirmed that on average, the BNP 1-32 concentration in healthy subjects is very low (median under 1 ng/L). The setup of a new generation of commercial BNP immunoassay methods with a relevant increment in both analytical sensitivity and specificity is needed in order to detect these very low analyte concentrations.…”
Section: Hf Therapy With Arni: Is It the Time For The Renaissance Of mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…As expected, this new ELISA for BNP 1-32 measured much lower BNP values than the commercial BNP method using the fully automated ARCHITECT platform. In 22 healthy subjects, the median (interquartile range) BNP concentration measured by the specific ELISA was 0.29 (0.2-0.6) ng/L, whereas the median value measured by ARCHITECT method was 17.3 (8.7-22.5) ng/L; even larger was the difference in BNP values measured by these two methods in a group of HF patients: 40.7 (2.0-90.1) ng/L (n = 42) vs. 1778 (1134-2853) ng/L (n = 39), respectively [53]. Interestingly, despite greatly lower values measured, this ELISA for BNP showed a percent increase in median BNP concentrations from the groups of healthy controls to HF patients slightly higher than that of ARCHITECT method (59% vs. 44%).…”
Section: Quality Specifications For An Accurate Bnp Assaymentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations