2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00398-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a copro-antigen capture ELISA for detecting Ostertagia ostertagi infections in cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, these immunological methods also have their limitations. Parasite ES products are released in the GI tract and these antigens may be digested during its passage (Agneessens et al 2001). Another problem with these methods is the cross-reactivity with other concurring GI nematodes (Johnson et al 1996) or other parasites (Agneessens et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, these immunological methods also have their limitations. Parasite ES products are released in the GI tract and these antigens may be digested during its passage (Agneessens et al 2001). Another problem with these methods is the cross-reactivity with other concurring GI nematodes (Johnson et al 1996) or other parasites (Agneessens et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copro-antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays take into account current intestinal infection with adult worms because these methods detect excretory/secretory (ES) antigens released by the metabolic active stages (Agneessens et al 2001;Deplazes et al 1992;Roepstorff 1998). Unfortunately, these immunological methods also have their limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, if simplified and inexpensive protocols are developed, the immunologic detection of hookworm coproantigens may represent an attractive diagnostic alternative to fecal egg assays. Coproantigen ELISAs have previously been reported for nematodes such as Haemonchus contortus 25 and Teladorsagia circumcincta 26 in sheep, Ostertagia ostertagi in cattle, 27 Heligmosomoides polygyrus 28 and Trichinella spiralis 29 in mice, and Strongyloides ratti in rats. 30 However, to our knowledge this is the first report of the technique being applied to the diagnosis and evaluation of experimental hookworm infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asterisks below the brackets indicate level of significance: *P < 0.01 or **P < 0.001. nematode species. [26][27][28]30 Although additional studies of the sensitivity and specificity of the fecal ELISA will be necessary if the assay is to be adapted for use as a human diagnostic test, these preliminary results suggest that the fecal ELISA may eventually offer a means to diagnose low intensity infections that might not be detected by conventional microscopy, allowing for more accurate estimates of hookworm prevalence. We noted that OD values were generally lower when ES was diluted in fecal extract as opposed to PBS-T, indicating some inhibition of the assay by fecal material; similar findings have been reported for the previously cited fecal ELISAs for other nematodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have also been reports where assay sensitivity and/or specificity was unsatisfactory e.g. detection of Strongyloies ratti [23], Haemonchus contortus [24] and Ostertagia ostertagi [25]. With the exception of the O. Ostertagia assay, assays of satisfactory performance have employed specific antiserum raised against excretory/secretory (E/S) antigens of the respective parasites, rather than utilizing antiserum raised against total somatic antigen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%