2009
DOI: 10.1039/b810085c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a DNA-dosimeter system for monitoring the effects of solar-ultraviolet radiation

Abstract: Solar radiation sustains and affects all life forms on Earth. In recent years, the increase in environmental levels of solar-UV radiation due to depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer, as a result of anthropogenic emission of destructive chemicals, has highlighted serious issues of social concern. This becomes still more dramatic in tropical and subtropical regions, where the intensity of solar radiation is higher. To better understand the impact of the harmful effects of solar-UV radiation on the DNA mole… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
91
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, studies indicate that UVA radiation induces CPDs directly on DNA more readily than it induces oxidized bases, suggesting that UVA may be more mutagenic than previously assumed (Jiang et al, 2009;Schuch et al, 2009). Additionally, although UVA absorption by DNA is poor, the presence of 6,4PPs in purified DNA samples and in human cell cultures after irradiation with UVA light has been demonstrated (Cortat et al, 2013;Schuch et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, studies indicate that UVA radiation induces CPDs directly on DNA more readily than it induces oxidized bases, suggesting that UVA may be more mutagenic than previously assumed (Jiang et al, 2009;Schuch et al, 2009). Additionally, although UVA absorption by DNA is poor, the presence of 6,4PPs in purified DNA samples and in human cell cultures after irradiation with UVA light has been demonstrated (Cortat et al, 2013;Schuch et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The direct absorption of UVB photons, mainly by the pyrimidine bases cytosine (C) and thymine (T), leads to the formation of distortive DNA lesions known as pyrimidine dimers. The main DNA photoproducts are cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and pyrimidine (6,4) pyrimidone photoproducts (6,4PPs) (Rastogi et al, 2010;Schuch et al, 2009). However, sunlight can also indirectly damage DNA after photon absorption by other chromophores, thereby generating reactive oxygen species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3B). A proporção de fotoprodutos de DNA formados, tanto por luz UVC e UVB, é de 75% de CPD e 25% de 6-4PPs (Kobayashi et al, 2001;Schuch et al, 2009). Porém, enquanto CPD é formado de maneira aleatória na cromatina, 6-4PP apresentam diferente distribuição com formação preferencial em regiões entre nucleossomos (Mitchell et al, 1990).…”
Section: Luz Uv E Consequências Dos Fotoprodutosunclassified
“…The enzymes were tested up to saturation, so that all lesions were cleaved, but in amounts where no non-specific cleavage was observed. 28 Damaged plasmid DNA samples were subject to electrophoresis in 0.8% agarose gels already stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/ mL) in a Tris-borate buffer (pH 7.5). After migration, the DNA was visualized under UV light using an Image Quant 300 (GE Healthcare, USA), to obtain digital images of the stained gels.…”
Section: Dna Damage Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%