2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2009.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a DNA microarray for simultaneous detection and genotyping of lyssaviruses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As underlined by Fooks et al [2], the development of new molecular tools for the detection of rabies virus, such as microarrays for lyssavirus detection [37], [38] or antibody titrations using lentiviral pseudotypes [39] are aimed at improving rabies surveillance and control activities. However, their applicability in laboratories in most rabies-endemic countries is debatable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As underlined by Fooks et al [2], the development of new molecular tools for the detection of rabies virus, such as microarrays for lyssavirus detection [37], [38] or antibody titrations using lentiviral pseudotypes [39] are aimed at improving rabies surveillance and control activities. However, their applicability in laboratories in most rabies-endemic countries is debatable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, microarray protocols for the detection of lyssaviruses have been able to demonstrate a high species-level concordance with standard reference assays (7,18). Although potentially suitable for a diagnostic purpose, the method is still not used on a routine basis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Other groups have reported using a similar method to randomly amplify virus for microarray detection from other sources such as nasal lavages, 12 endotracheal aspirates, 28 and homogenized mouse brains. 11 Using RT-rPCR amplicons, we were able to detect virus derived from cell culture but not from infected mosquitoes (Figure 1). Perhaps the ratio of viral RNA compared with non-viral RNA in samples from previous studies was greater than that found in infected arthropods, making the amplification of viral RNA less efficient in the presence of excessive amounts of arthropod RNA and DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the platform was shown to be a useful tool for Influenza A virus genotyping, providing evidence that the microarray can be used for the detection and genetic characterization of pathogens. 10,11 Even though some microarrays have been developed to target mosquito-borne viruses, particularly flaviviruses pathogenic to humans, none were evaluated with infected mosquitoes. [12][13][14][15][16][17] Recently, a microarray was adapted to identify Culicoides species belonging to the Obsoletus group, potential bluetongue virus vectors, however it was not tested in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%