2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-9565-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a dual-antimicrobial counterselection method for markerless genetic engineering of bacterial genomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We demonstrate, however, that the high 2-DOG concentration leads to a high success rate for obtaining unmarked mutants. The average success rate of our method is >85 %, considerably higher than previously employed methods for generating markerless mutations in N. gonorrhoeae [11,39], and comparable to other counter-selection markers in different species [38,40,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We demonstrate, however, that the high 2-DOG concentration leads to a high success rate for obtaining unmarked mutants. The average success rate of our method is >85 %, considerably higher than previously employed methods for generating markerless mutations in N. gonorrhoeae [11,39], and comparable to other counter-selection markers in different species [38,40,41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The average success rate of our method is >85 %, considerably higher than previously employed methods for generating markerless mutations in N. gonorrhoeae [11, 39], and comparable to other counter-selection markers in different species [38, 40, 41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A diverse range of genetic tools has been developed only to prevent the negative impacts of genetically modified organisms on the field, including antibiotic gene-free genetic engineering tools (Ji et al 2019 ) and suicide genetic systems (Honjo et al 2019 ; Marguet et al 2010 ; Scott et al 2017 ). By using synthetic biology and metabolic engineering, an attempt has been already made to engineer microorganisms, which can be efficiently used as self-eliminate microbial scavengers for the bioremediation of various toxic environmental pollutants (Moog et al 2019 ; French et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Modern Biotechnological Methods To Enhance Microplastic Degr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To cure pGW1 from the strain C. sakazakii GZcsf-1, the specific fragment that was amplified from the plasmid to be removed using the primer pair pGW1-F and pGW1-R was mixed with plasmid pCVD442 that was linearized using the primer pair pCVD442-F1 and pCVD442-R1 and the ermC fragment amplified from pUC57-ermC (Ji et al, 2019) using the primer pair ermC-F and ermC-R. The following procedure was identical as the protocols described for the removal of pESA3, but 300 mg/L erythromycin was used to select strains harboring the hybrid plasmid.…”
Section: Curing Of Endogenous Plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 99%